2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.03294
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of Advanced Virgo and reconstruction of detector strain h(t) during the Observing Run O3

F. Acernese,
M. Agathos,
A. Ain
et al.

Abstract: Calibration of Advanced Virgo and reconstruction of detector strain h(t) during the Observing Run O33

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duty factors for this run were 76%, 71%, and 76% for L1, H1, and V1, respectively. The uncertainties on the amplitude and phase calibration of the detectors for O2 can be found in Cahillane et al (2017); Acernese et al (2018) and those for O3 can be found in Sun et al (2020Sun et al ( , 2021; Acernese et al (2021). For O2, the maximum 1σ amplitude uncertainties over the range 10-2000 Hz were between about [−2.5, +7.5]% and [−8, +4]% for H1 and L1, respectively, and for Virgo the the maximum uncertainty was 5.1%.…”
Section: Gravitational-wave Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The duty factors for this run were 76%, 71%, and 76% for L1, H1, and V1, respectively. The uncertainties on the amplitude and phase calibration of the detectors for O2 can be found in Cahillane et al (2017); Acernese et al (2018) and those for O3 can be found in Sun et al (2020Sun et al ( , 2021; Acernese et al (2021). For O2, the maximum 1σ amplitude uncertainties over the range 10-2000 Hz were between about [−2.5, +7.5]% and [−8, +4]% for H1 and L1, respectively, and for Virgo the the maximum uncertainty was 5.1%.…”
Section: Gravitational-wave Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data used underwent cleaning processes (Davis et al 2019;Viets & Wade 2021;Acernese et al 2021), specifically the removal of narrowband spectral artifacts at the calibration line frequencies and power line frequencies. A discussion on the consequences of performing a search using LIGO data with the narrowband cleaning of Viets & Wade (2021) applied compared to that without it applied can be found in Appendix A.…”
Section: Gravitational-wave Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compute the percentage of injections that have a significance higher than the best event candidate and look for the amplitude at which this percentage is above 90%, which sets the upper limit. We include O3b calibration errors (Sun et al 2021;Acernese et al 2021) by jittering the amplitude and arrival time according to a Gaussian distribution representative of the calibration uncertainties. As with the modeled search, these injection sets allow us to calculate 90% exclusion distances.…”
Section: Search For Generic Gw Transientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtained results indicate that the adopted methodology, based on the pytvfemd adaptive algorithm, is suitable to monitor the onset and evolution of scattered light noise, related to environmental noise variability in GW interferometers. As the source of scattered light during O3 was known to be the West end bench, this noise was mainly removed during the online noise subtraction using the relevant photodiode as a witness channel [30]. This allowed to remove the scattered light noise so that it would not significantly affect the gravitational wave strain data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%