2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration of a large water-Cherenkov detector at the Sierra Negra site of LAGO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 2 shows one diagram that illustrates the flow of the information from PMT signal to data acquisition, This diagram is a typical setup for collecting information about photon counting and signal integration [5,6]. Each outrigger has one Hamamatsu R5912 8" PMT at the bottom and is powered by a CAEN V6533 high voltage VME module at an optimal tension (see Table 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2 shows one diagram that illustrates the flow of the information from PMT signal to data acquisition, This diagram is a typical setup for collecting information about photon counting and signal integration [5,6]. Each outrigger has one Hamamatsu R5912 8" PMT at the bottom and is powered by a CAEN V6533 high voltage VME module at an optimal tension (see Table 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained with LAGO-GD are presented according to the calibration process described in [24,25]: converting the signal detected (in this case the number of pe) into physical units of energy deposited (E d ). A single high-energy muon impinging vertically at the center of the WCD, called Vertical Equivalent Muon (VEM) [24,26], is the calibration unit defined as the average charge collected in the PMT.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2019)412mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signals were post-processed using a program developed in LabVIEW for the calculation of four characteristic parameters: charge deposited, maximum voltage, and two signals related with the duration or widths of the signal, t50 and t90 they are the time interval in which the integrated charge of the individual signals rise from 10% to 50 % and 90%. These parameters are distributed differently depending on the type and energy of particle that interacts with the scintillator [10][11][12][13]. All data were analyzed using the ROOT program, a data analysis framework [14].…”
Section: Detector Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%