“…For these reasons, the question of the optimal choice of parameters in different methods of lifetime measurement has been addressed in the past (Ballew & Demas, 1989, Ballew & Demas, 1991; Hall & Selinger, 1981; Good, Kallir, & Wild, 1984; Heeg, 2013, 2014; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore, Chan, Demas, & DeGraff, 2004; Peng, Liu, Zhao, & Kim, 2016; Santra et al, 2016; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993; Xu, Qiao, Nie, & Zhang, 2016). Theoretical studies of time‐domain methods, where the sample is excited by a short pulse and the decay subsequently detected in a variable number of time channels (gates), have focused on various aspects of the detection scheme: the number of time channels and their widths (Hall & Selinger, 1981; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004), the channel overlap (Chan, Fuller, Demas, & DeGraff, 2001; Heeg, 2014; Moore et al, 2004), the effect of different noise distributions (Heeg, 2013, 2014; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993), the effect of background (Ballew & Demas, 1991; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004; Soper & Legendre, 1994), etc., and have identified the optimal parameters and quantified the expected errors.…”