2016
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.33.001961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration method for the center of mass method to enlarge the solvable range of fluorescence lifetime

Abstract: This paper presents a calibration method for the center of mass method based on rough rapid lifetime determination (RLD) to enlarge the solvable range of fluorescence lifetime. The proposed method defines the ratio of two photon count numbers as a threshold parameter to characterize the length of the sample lifetime. When detecting long lifetimes beyond the threshold, a raw lifetime is estimated first through RLD. Then the raw lifetime is compensated to get a precise one. Simulation results show the solvable r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, the question of the optimal choice of parameters in different methods of lifetime measurement has been addressed in the past (Ballew & Demas, 1989, Ballew & Demas, 1991; Hall & Selinger, 1981; Good, Kallir, & Wild, 1984; Heeg, 2013, 2014; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore, Chan, Demas, & DeGraff, 2004; Peng, Liu, Zhao, & Kim, 2016; Santra et al, 2016; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993; Xu, Qiao, Nie, & Zhang, 2016). Theoretical studies of time‐domain methods, where the sample is excited by a short pulse and the decay subsequently detected in a variable number of time channels (gates), have focused on various aspects of the detection scheme: the number of time channels and their widths (Hall & Selinger, 1981; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004), the channel overlap (Chan, Fuller, Demas, & DeGraff, 2001; Heeg, 2014; Moore et al, 2004), the effect of different noise distributions (Heeg, 2013, 2014; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993), the effect of background (Ballew & Demas, 1991; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004; Soper & Legendre, 1994), etc., and have identified the optimal parameters and quantified the expected errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the question of the optimal choice of parameters in different methods of lifetime measurement has been addressed in the past (Ballew & Demas, 1989, Ballew & Demas, 1991; Hall & Selinger, 1981; Good, Kallir, & Wild, 1984; Heeg, 2013, 2014; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore, Chan, Demas, & DeGraff, 2004; Peng, Liu, Zhao, & Kim, 2016; Santra et al, 2016; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993; Xu, Qiao, Nie, & Zhang, 2016). Theoretical studies of time‐domain methods, where the sample is excited by a short pulse and the decay subsequently detected in a variable number of time channels (gates), have focused on various aspects of the detection scheme: the number of time channels and their widths (Hall & Selinger, 1981; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004), the channel overlap (Chan, Fuller, Demas, & DeGraff, 2001; Heeg, 2014; Moore et al, 2004), the effect of different noise distributions (Heeg, 2013, 2014; Tellinghuisen & Wilkerson, 1993), the effect of background (Ballew & Demas, 1991; Köllner & Wolfrum, 1992; Moore et al, 2004; Soper & Legendre, 1994), etc., and have identified the optimal parameters and quantified the expected errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%