2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration factors for determination of relativistic particle induced fission rates in natU, 235U, 232Th, natPb and 197Au foils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beam integral was determined with around 10% accuracy due to the fit of the excitation function of the 27 Al(d,3p2n) 24 Na monitoring reaction as only 3 values for this reaction cross section are present in the EXFOR database in the GeV energy range [12,13]. The beam position and profile were determined using the solid state nuclear track detectors (SSNTD) by means of the measurement of distribution of induced fission rates by the beam in natural lead samples [14,15]. A fit of the experimental data by Gaussian distribution in the horizontal and vertical direction was used as input parameters for the particle source in the Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam integral was determined with around 10% accuracy due to the fit of the excitation function of the 27 Al(d,3p2n) 24 Na monitoring reaction as only 3 values for this reaction cross section are present in the EXFOR database in the GeV energy range [12,13]. The beam position and profile were determined using the solid state nuclear track detectors (SSNTD) by means of the measurement of distribution of induced fission rates by the beam in natural lead samples [14,15]. A fit of the experimental data by Gaussian distribution in the horizontal and vertical direction was used as input parameters for the particle source in the Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the definition of thick is where the thickness of the foil is larger than the range of the fission fragments in the foil material. The SSNTD used in this work was synthetic muscovite mica, where the calibration factor for thick 232 Th, w Th has been calculated previously [27]. A weighted mean value of (8.97 AE0:22Þ Â 10 18 tracks cm À2 (fissions per atom) À1 obtained from the theoretical and Monte Carlo simulations of Hashemi-Nezhad et al was used [27].…”
Section: Fission Track Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSNTD used in this work was synthetic muscovite mica, where the calibration factor for thick 232 Th, w Th has been calculated previously [27]. A weighted mean value of (8.97 AE0:22Þ Â 10 18 tracks cm À2 (fissions per atom) À1 obtained from the theoretical and Monte Carlo simulations of Hashemi-Nezhad et al was used [27]. An earlier study measuring the thorium fission rate in a fast spallation and neutron field found close agreement between experimental and calculated results with the use of this value [28].…”
Section: Fission Track Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] were discussed the calibration factor in details and have presented experimental and theoretical procedures for its determination [5].…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our calculation we used the calibration factors for 181 Ta, 197 Au, 207 Pb, 209 Bi, 232 T h, 238 U which were previously determined in works [5] and are presented in the …”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%