2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1ja10024f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration by the standard addition and indicative dilution method in flame atomic absorption spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…148 The authors claim that this approach works better than the normal standard additions approach providing the interferences are not multiplicative. 148 The authors claim that this approach works better than the normal standard additions approach providing the interferences are not multiplicative.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…148 The authors claim that this approach works better than the normal standard additions approach providing the interferences are not multiplicative. 148 The authors claim that this approach works better than the normal standard additions approach providing the interferences are not multiplicative.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard addition and indicative dilution method has been developed which consists of addition of a standard solution to a sample and then successive dilution of this until the signal is equal to that produced by the undiluted sample. 148 The authors claim that this approach works better than the normal standard additions approach providing the interferences are not multiplicative.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denitions, terms and classications of different calibration approaches have been presented in several papers [1][2][3][4] and some novel calibration strategies aimed at overcoming the problem of analytical inaccuracy have been developed. 2,[5][6][7][8][9][10] However, each calibration procedure allows for only one estimate of analyte concentration in a sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the above-mentioned drawbacks, at present, the use of internal standard calibration using SIL-IS is the best option available to ensure the removal of matrix effects from LC-MS data. In practice, SIL-IS are generally very expensive and they are often not commercially The standard addition method, taught through analytical chemistry text books as a calibration method to be used when matrix effects cannot be eliminated by physical means, has been widely used in spectrophotometric analysis, especially in atomic spectroscopy (240)(241)(242)(243).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%