2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2001)127:4(270)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration Assessment and Data Collection for Water Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another disadvantage is the need for gradient evaluations while the calibration process is engaged. Quite a number of works can be found in the literature about these methods, see for instance (Lansey et al, 2001) describing a General Reduced Gradient method to solve the steady-state calibration hydraulic problem; (Datta & Sridharan, 1994) describing the use of a Sensitivity Analysis Technique belonging to the Newton methods family; (Pudar & Ligget, 1992) using the Levenberg-Marquardt approach; (Di Cristo et al, 2003) presented a steady-state hydraulic parameter calibration procedure using a gradient method; (Greco et al, 1999) formulated the minimizing problem as a quadratic programming problem or (Todini, 1999) who used a Kalman filtering approach. On the other hand, one of the main characteristics of adaptive heuristic methods is their ability to move out of local optima and globally sample the search space.…”
Section: Water Distribution System: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage is the need for gradient evaluations while the calibration process is engaged. Quite a number of works can be found in the literature about these methods, see for instance (Lansey et al, 2001) describing a General Reduced Gradient method to solve the steady-state calibration hydraulic problem; (Datta & Sridharan, 1994) describing the use of a Sensitivity Analysis Technique belonging to the Newton methods family; (Pudar & Ligget, 1992) using the Levenberg-Marquardt approach; (Di Cristo et al, 2003) presented a steady-state hydraulic parameter calibration procedure using a gradient method; (Greco et al, 1999) formulated the minimizing problem as a quadratic programming problem or (Todini, 1999) who used a Kalman filtering approach. On the other hand, one of the main characteristics of adaptive heuristic methods is their ability to move out of local optima and globally sample the search space.…”
Section: Water Distribution System: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a common practice to reduce the number of calibrated parameters is to group pipe roughness coefficients [10], and increase the number of demand conditions [8]. Then, the elements of Jacobian matrix are approximated by using finite difference method [9].…”
Section: Parameter Estimation and Calibration Of Hydraulic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Schaetzen [7] proposed three new algorithms, two out of these were based on the shortest path concept while the third approach was based on the maximization of Shannon's entropy. Kapelan et al [8] developed three methods based on D-and A-optimality criterion and on the model prediction uncertainty, which was previously used by Lansey et al [9]. Behzadian et al [10] used multi-objective genetic algorithm and adaptive neural network to design a good sampling layout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the five demand components are calibrated by minimizing the error in pressure and flow measurements at each hour using the LS-based methodology detailed in (Sanz and Pérez 2015). The uncertainty calculation is done by propagating the sensors' noise using the First Order Second Moment model (Lansey et al 2001). Fig.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%