2016
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1091083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration approach estimation of the mean in stratified sampling and stratified double sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several calibration estimators for the population mean in a stratified sampling using different parameters of one auxiliary variable in the calibration constraints have been proposed in the literature (see Tracey, Singh and Arnab (2003), Rao, Tekabu and Khan (2016), Koyuncu and Kadilar (2016), Sisodia, Singh and Singh (2017), Alam, Singh and Shabbir (2019), Garg and Pachori (2019), Alam and Shabbir (2020), Babatunde et al (2023), Oladugba et al (2023) etc.). Several calibration estimators were arrived at by modifying existing estimators (see Kadilar and Cingi (2006), Garg and Pachori (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several calibration estimators for the population mean in a stratified sampling using different parameters of one auxiliary variable in the calibration constraints have been proposed in the literature (see Tracey, Singh and Arnab (2003), Rao, Tekabu and Khan (2016), Koyuncu and Kadilar (2016), Sisodia, Singh and Singh (2017), Alam, Singh and Shabbir (2019), Garg and Pachori (2019), Alam and Shabbir (2020), Babatunde et al (2023), Oladugba et al (2023) etc.). Several calibration estimators were arrived at by modifying existing estimators (see Kadilar and Cingi (2006), Garg and Pachori (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several calibration estimators for the population mean in a stratified sampling using different parameters of one auxiliary variable in the calibration constraints have been proposed in the literature (see Tracey, Singh and Arnab (2003), Rao, Tekabu and Khan (2016), Koyuncu and Kadilar (2016), Sisodia, Singh and Singh (2017), Alam, Singh and Shabbir (2019), Garg and Pachori (2019), Alam and Shabbir (2020), Babatunde et al ( 2023), Oladugba et al (2023) etc.). Several calibration estimators were arrived at by modifying existing estimators (see , Garg and Pachori (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deville and Sarndal (1992) defined it as a procedure of minimizing a distance function subject to calibration constraints. In this direction, various calibration estimators for various sampling schemes for estimating the population parameters by using different calibration constraints based on the available auxiliary information have been developed by Singh (2003), Kim et al (2007), Singh and Arnab (2011), Kadilar (2013 and2016), Mouhamed et al (2015), Clement and Enang (2017), Nidhi et al (2017), Garg and Pachori (2019, 2020, Alka et al (2021), Khare et al (2022), Pachori et al (2022), Kumar et al (2023), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
An improved ratio-type calibrated estimator was developed using the logarithmic mean in the calibration constraint for the stratified random sampling scheme. The proposed estimator was extended in the case of stratified double sampling and compared with the estimators given by Tracy et al ( 2003) together its ratio-type estimators, as well as Nidhi et al (2017) and Khare et al (2022). A simulation study was also carried out on both a real and artificial dataset in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator compared to the existing estimators.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%