2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and verification of DEM parameters for dynamic particle flow conditions using a backpropagation neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether under static (baffle lift test) or dynamic conditions (rotary drum test), the error between the comparison tests is lower than 5%, which is also in line with the error criteria mentioned by Ye et al [19]. Simultaneously, we found that although the relative error verified by the baffle lift test is small, it is between 0.77% and 4.86%.…”
Section: Development and Application Of The Bp Prediction Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whether under static (baffle lift test) or dynamic conditions (rotary drum test), the error between the comparison tests is lower than 5%, which is also in line with the error criteria mentioned by Ye et al [19]. Simultaneously, we found that although the relative error verified by the baffle lift test is small, it is between 0.77% and 4.86%.…”
Section: Development and Application Of The Bp Prediction Modelsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To reasonably obtain a feasible solution that satisfies the mapping relation and to achieve a target value of the stacking angle mean of the actual test, which is listed in Appendix A, Table A2), the discrete outputs of the predicted output are compared and eliminated. The difference between the output value of the BP prediction model and that of the calibration experiment is less than 5% [19], and the condition is satisfied. These conditions can be expressed as:AORTol=Object|outputstargetstargets|5%,Subject to outputs=ffalse(inputsfalse), inputsmininputsinputsmax.…”
Section: Development and Application Of The Bp Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Friction coefficients (Table 1) have a direct physical representation; however, in DEM software these parameters are integrated into DEM codes of contact models and may affect the behavior of bulk materials in different ways, that is, they are code dependent [6,7]. Since the values of the friction coefficients (DEM parameters) significantly affect the behavior of bulk materials, in order to build an adequate model, they have to be calibrated [8][9][10]. Many researchers offer their approaches and solutions for the DEM parameters calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic input values that are set in the simulations include density, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio [7,8]. Once these values are set, it is necessary to determine interaction coefficients (static and rolling friction, restitution), which can significantly influence the static and dynamic flow, and are very often used as calibration parameters [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%