2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of the Physical Activity Barrier Scale for persons who are blind or visually impaired

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown divergent results in the levels of physical activity between male and female with VI. While some indicate that there are no significant differences in physical activity levels between men and women, others report that males were more active and participatory in physical activities than females [9,35]. The latter corroborate with the results found in the present study, where men presented higher levels than women, mainly in vigorous activities.…”
Section: Original Articlesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown divergent results in the levels of physical activity between male and female with VI. While some indicate that there are no significant differences in physical activity levels between men and women, others report that males were more active and participatory in physical activities than females [9,35]. The latter corroborate with the results found in the present study, where men presented higher levels than women, mainly in vigorous activities.…”
Section: Original Articlesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…VI seems to have a substantial impact on an individual's health-related quality of life compared to other chronic conditions such as type II diabetes and hearing impairment [5]. It can significantly reduce participation in social, religious, mobility, visually intensive tasks, daily and workrelated activities [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to item statistics, there were three items (13,19 and 28) with item-total correlations of <0.3. Nevertheless, Cronbach's alpha did not decrease when these items were deleted ( Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subheading is assessed using a score ranging between 0 and 100. Low scores indicate good QoL (13).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if we have and infit value of 1.40, then we can assert that there is 40% more data variability compared to the prediction of the model; while an outfit of 0.80 indicates that 20% less data variability is observed with respect to the model´s prediction. There are different criteria in selecting the cut-off values of MNSQ (e.g., Cadime, Ribeiro, Viana, Santos, & Prieto, 2014;Lee, Zhu, Ackley-Holbrook, Brower & Mcmurray, 2014;Linacre, 2012;Prieto & Delgado, 2003). In our case, we used an approximate range of 0.7-1.3 for MNSQ values to be an appropriate indication of good fit between data and model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%