2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and Validation of Swat Model for Kunthipuzha Basin Using SUFI-2 Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Algorithm (SUFI-2) is very advantageous since it combines optimization with uncertainty analysis and can handle large number of parameter to achieve good prediction uncertainty ranges for the period of 6 years (2002 to 2007). Responded to parameter set more sensitive than any others [23,24].…”
Section: Swat -Cupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Algorithm (SUFI-2) is very advantageous since it combines optimization with uncertainty analysis and can handle large number of parameter to achieve good prediction uncertainty ranges for the period of 6 years (2002 to 2007). Responded to parameter set more sensitive than any others [23,24].…”
Section: Swat -Cupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on generally acceptable performance criteria [68,69], the SWAT model was well calibrated (R 2 = 0.67 and NSE = 0.61) and validated (R 2 = 0.58 and NSE = 0.55). The performance outcomes represent uncertainty in the model and are probably related to significant variation in topography and rainfall [70].…”
Section: Swat Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value is considered acceptable when it ranges from zero to one (Pechlivanidis et al 2011). The average tendency of the simulated result becoming smaller or larger than the recorded one is measured by PBIAS of which the magnitude of zero represents optimum (Tejaswini & Sathian 2018).…”
Section: Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 93%