2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results, all the four factors and only two interactions (Gi*Li and Exi*Si) were significant [15]). For each considered factor (x-axis: critical gap, Gi; length of reduced speed area, Li; position of desired exiting speed section, Exi; desired approach speed, Si), the average per cent error between simulated speed and observed speed along the through movement A-C (y-axis) was derived (the so-called main effects plot were used).…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Based on the results, all the four factors and only two interactions (Gi*Li and Exi*Si) were significant [15]). For each considered factor (x-axis: critical gap, Gi; length of reduced speed area, Li; position of desired exiting speed section, Exi; desired approach speed, Si), the average per cent error between simulated speed and observed speed along the through movement A-C (y-axis) was derived (the so-called main effects plot were used).…”
Section: Results and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many of these studies were based on statistical comparisons and utilized GAs to identify potential parameter sets [3,7,8,9,11]. In addition, many made use of ITS data, which are becoming more widely available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, two descriptive statistics (median and dispersion) and the maximum difference in the cumulative function were tested using nonparametric testing methods. Cunto et al [3] utilized a calibration procedure consisting of four steps. Their procedure included a heuristic selection of the initial model inputs; statistical screening using a Plackett-Burnman with factorial design; the development of a linear expression relating significant model inputs to safety performance (fractional factorial analysis); and the GA procedure to obtain best estimate model parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Cunto and Saccomanno assumed that two times of Maximum Available Deceleration Rate (2*MADR) follows a truncated normal distribution with an average of 7.42 m/s 2 and standard deviation of 0.24 m/s 2 [28]. In another study the same authors assumed a normal truncated distribution with an average of 8.45 m/s 2 , standard deviation of 1.40 m/s 2 and the upper and lower limits of 12.68 m/s 2 and 4.23 m/s 2 , respectively for 2*MADR for small vehicles on dry pavements [29].…”
Section: Deceleration Rate To Avoid Collisionmentioning
confidence: 99%