40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting &Amp; Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of EASM turbulence model for jet flowfields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Launder & Sharma (1974) specifically calibrated the coefficients contained in the transport equations for K and ε for high Reynolds number jet flows and suggested the following values: c 1 = 1.43 and c 2 = 1.92. Furthermore, Papp et al (2002) recognized that the EASM α was calibrated for homogeneous turbulent wall-bounded flows, leading to an under-prediction of mixing rates in shear layers. They therefore made an attempt to recalibrate the EASM α for high Reynolds number jet flows and determined that an increase of a 1 from 0.4866 to 0.5416, in addition to using the coefficients by Launder & Sharma (1974), had the desired effect of increasing the turbulence levels in the shear layer without adversely affecting the pressure-strain rate correlation.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Rans Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Launder & Sharma (1974) specifically calibrated the coefficients contained in the transport equations for K and ε for high Reynolds number jet flows and suggested the following values: c 1 = 1.43 and c 2 = 1.92. Furthermore, Papp et al (2002) recognized that the EASM α was calibrated for homogeneous turbulent wall-bounded flows, leading to an under-prediction of mixing rates in shear layers. They therefore made an attempt to recalibrate the EASM α for high Reynolds number jet flows and determined that an increase of a 1 from 0.4866 to 0.5416, in addition to using the coefficients by Launder & Sharma (1974), had the desired effect of increasing the turbulence levels in the shear layer without adversely affecting the pressure-strain rate correlation.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Rans Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and coefficients according to Papp et al (2002) (•), EASM α omitting c.e. and coefficients according to Papp et al (2002) ---), EASM α using c.e. and original coefficients (+), EASM α using c.e.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Rans Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While we have incorporated scalar fluctuation equations [9] and a variable Prandtl number model [10] in our CFD codes, these have not been extended to account for compressibility effects which serve to diminish scalar fluctuation levels. Our work with more advanced explicit algebraic stress models (EASM) for jet noise applications [11,12] is still at the research stage and the subject of current investigation in a NASA Glenn program. Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%