2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00514-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of an ASM3-based steady-state model for activated sludge systems—part I:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an estimate, while highly conservative relative to WWTP performance design, can substantially increase capital and operation costs due to overcapacity. In contrast, a more recent model estimated that the autotrophic biomass was negligible, accounting for only 2 to 3% of the total activated sludge mass in municipal wastewater (21). Our values suggest that the amount of autotrophic biomass in municipal WWTP may be even smaller.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Such an estimate, while highly conservative relative to WWTP performance design, can substantially increase capital and operation costs due to overcapacity. In contrast, a more recent model estimated that the autotrophic biomass was negligible, accounting for only 2 to 3% of the total activated sludge mass in municipal wastewater (21). Our values suggest that the amount of autotrophic biomass in municipal WWTP may be even smaller.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…The Y N obtained is 0.06 mg COD mg -1 N, which is in the same range for the NOB yield values reported in the literature (Koch et al 2001;Jubany et al 2005). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…10.3), because the oxygen and nitrite consumption of the NOB are accurately described by the estimated parameters. (Henze et al 1987;Koch et al 2001;Jubany et al 2005;Vadivelu, 2006). The halfsaturation constant value is greater than the most of values reported (Henze et al 1987;Gujer et al 1999;Henze et al 2000).…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, recent molecular studies have reported that the microbes of the Nitrospira phylum were the main NOB and they play a more active role than the Nitrobacter (Dionisi et al, 2002;Geets et al, 2007;Rysgaard and Glud, 2004;Wuchter et al, 2006). Many researchers (Araki et al, 2004;Dionisi et al, 2002;Geets et al, 2007;Harms et al, 2003;Koch et al, 2001;Kowalchuk and Stephen, 2001;Mertoglu, 2008;Robinson et al, 2003;Rotthauwe et al, 1997;Urakawa et al, 2006) have reported quantitative relationships among ammoniaand nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Urakawa et al (2006) have studied the abundance and population structure of AOB in the marine environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the quantification results between the two methods is explained by the presence of g-AOB and Anammox, which are potential targets of anti-HAO antibodies. In the ASM3 model, autotrophic biomass fraction is assumed as only 2e3% of the total activated sludge mass for the proper nitrification in the municipal wastewater (Koch et al, 2001). However, in literature, this fraction extends from 0.009% to 13.8% (Araki et al, 2004), which shows that the data are very scattered in the activated sludge systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%