2017
DOI: 10.21514/1998-426x-2017-10-1-18-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and testing of a portable NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer-dosimeter for evaluation of terrestrial radionuclides and 137Cs contributions to ambient dose equivalent rate outdoors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the energy resolution of our NaI(Tl) detector of 8% (662 keV), the 662 keV peak itself, due to its very small area, can hardly be distinguished against the background contribution of radiation from natural radionuclides (see also Figure 2 in Ramzaev et al . ( 14 ) ). It will be possible to confirm or reject the presence of 137 Cs in soil of the grassland areas based on results of laboratory analysis of samples taken near the BelNPP ( 10 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the energy resolution of our NaI(Tl) detector of 8% (662 keV), the 662 keV peak itself, due to its very small area, can hardly be distinguished against the background contribution of radiation from natural radionuclides (see also Figure 2 in Ramzaev et al . ( 14 ) ). It will be possible to confirm or reject the presence of 137 Cs in soil of the grassland areas based on results of laboratory analysis of samples taken near the BelNPP ( 10 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated values of ADER Cs at the 45 grassland plots ranged from −2.1 to 4.0 nSv/h (mean = 1.5 nSv/h; median = 1.7 nSv/h). The presence of values with a negative sign is explained by the influence of the uncertainty in calculating ADER Cs as the difference between ADER tot and ADER NRN ( 14 , 21 ) . The average statistical uncertainty for calculating ADER NRN was 9% or 4 nSv/h (95% probability).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations