2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and evaluation of sunshine-based empirical models for estimating daily solar radiation in Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… [ 35 ] Iran Twenty-one sunshine-based empirical models Number of days and sunshine Daily solar radiation 2007–2017 R 2 , MAE, MBE, RRMSE, MAPE, RMSE, and MBE 21 different sunshine-based empirical models were compared and calibrated. [ 36 ] Adrar, Algeria Proposed 6 temperature-based models Daily air temperature Daily average horizontal global solar radiation 4 years period MBE, RMSE, and R 2 Proposed M4 model shows best performance (R 2 = 0.87). [ 37 ] Industrial City, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Linear, Quadratic and Logarithmic Relative humidity, ambient temperature, and sunshine duration Global horizontal radiation January–December 2016 r, R 2 , RMSE, MBE, MABE, and MAPE 3 different models were examined and compared, the quadratic model has the highest r and R 2 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 35 ] Iran Twenty-one sunshine-based empirical models Number of days and sunshine Daily solar radiation 2007–2017 R 2 , MAE, MBE, RRMSE, MAPE, RMSE, and MBE 21 different sunshine-based empirical models were compared and calibrated. [ 36 ] Adrar, Algeria Proposed 6 temperature-based models Daily air temperature Daily average horizontal global solar radiation 4 years period MBE, RMSE, and R 2 Proposed M4 model shows best performance (R 2 = 0.87). [ 37 ] Industrial City, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Linear, Quadratic and Logarithmic Relative humidity, ambient temperature, and sunshine duration Global horizontal radiation January–December 2016 r, R 2 , RMSE, MBE, MABE, and MAPE 3 different models were examined and compared, the quadratic model has the highest r and R 2 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical methods for R s estimation have been widely established based on different input variables considering the low data requirements and computation. These statistical models are divided into sunshine‐ (Ångström, 1924; Naserpour et al, 2020), cloud‐ (Badescu & Dumitrescu, 2015; Ehnberg & Bollen, 2005), and temperature‐based models (Feng et al, 2019; Yacef et al, 2014). Studies have shown that sunshine–based models outperformed other models (Abdul‐Aziz et al, 1993; De, Souza, et al, 2016; Trnka et al, 2005), especially the Ångström–Prescott (A‐P) method (Prescott, 1940).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…established based on different input variables considering the low data requirements and computation. These statistical models are divided into sunshine- (Ångström, 1924;Naserpour et al, 2020), cloud- (Badescu & Dumitrescu, 2015;Ehnberg & Bollen, 2005), and temperature-based models (Feng et al, 2019;Yacef et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical prediction models can be found in the literature and are often used to estimate monthly solar irradiance. The most widely used approach is a sunshine-based predictive model [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%