2014
DOI: 10.4172/2380-2391.1000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and Evaluation of an X-Ray Fluorescence Method for the Determination of Lead and Arsenic in Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was demonstrated in glaciated terrains using till by Sarala (2016). This was also discussed by DiScenza et al (2014) for environmental analysis of soils. Ge et al (2005a) proposed procedures for the systematic use of pXRF in mineral exploration but the current practice is to develop site-specific strategies, making the most of continuous technology innovation by providers, and paying attention to QA/QC and to possible pitfalls (Brand, 2014;Brand and Brand, 2014).…”
Section: Relationship With Wet Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This was demonstrated in glaciated terrains using till by Sarala (2016). This was also discussed by DiScenza et al (2014) for environmental analysis of soils. Ge et al (2005a) proposed procedures for the systematic use of pXRF in mineral exploration but the current practice is to develop site-specific strategies, making the most of continuous technology innovation by providers, and paying attention to QA/QC and to possible pitfalls (Brand, 2014;Brand and Brand, 2014).…”
Section: Relationship With Wet Chemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Digestion blank Pb concentrations were <0.05 ng g −1 measured concentrations, duplicates were within 12%, and NIST Montana Soil 2711b recoveries were between 87% and 96% of their certified values. We derived a relationship between XRF counts and Pb concentration via a linear regression of all measurements to estimate the full downcore profile of Pb concentrations from XRF counts (Figure S2; DiScenza et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sedimentary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both XRF and LIBS have demonstrated their utility in chemical composition quantication of many different types of materials including geological [10][11][12][13][14][15] and environmental samples. [16][17][18][19] Moreover, both techniques have been validated for use in nuclear chemistry applications, including elemental analysis of uranium ores, 20,21 surrogate nuclear debris, 22 swipe samples 23 and nuclear fuel. 24,25 A 2017 study by Afgan et al implemented a handheld m-LIBS device for quantifying minor elements in steel, achieving measurement errors comparable to those of benchtop LIBS setups and superior to those yielded by commercial XRF instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%