2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129516000335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating word problems of groups via the complexity of equivalence relations

Abstract: (1) There is a finitely presented group with a word problem which is a\ud uniformly effectively inseparable equivalence relation. (2) There is a\ud finitely generated group of computable permutations with a word problem\ud which is a universal co-computably enumerable equivalence relation. (3)\ud Each c.e.\ truth-table degree contains the word problem of a finitely\ud generated group of computable permutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this we show that they can be realized by computable permutations. This connects our approach with previous work in computability theory concerning algebraic and computabily structure of the group of computable permutations, see [11] and [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Using this we show that they can be realized by computable permutations. This connects our approach with previous work in computability theory concerning algebraic and computabily structure of the group of computable permutations, see [11] and [12].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This was first proved by Miller III [26]. Another example, due to [29] refers to the computability theoretic notion of effective inseparability. We recall that a disjoint pair (U,V) of sets of numbers is effectively inseparable ( e.i .)…”
Section: Classes Of Algebras ≃ S‐realizing Provable Equivalence Of Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A f.p. group G is built in [29] such that =G is uniformly effectively inseparable , i.e., uniformly in x,y one can find an index of a partial recursive function ψ witnessing that the pair of sets ([x]=G,[y]=G) is e.i., if [x]=G[y]=G=. Such a f.p.…”
Section: Classes Of Algebras ≃ S‐realizing Provable Equivalence Of Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, ceers have played a leading role in the tale of computable reducibility: they appeared as the main characters of what are perhaps the first results about ď (although before the notion appeared in the literature), namely Miller III's construction ( [21]) of a finitely presented group whose word problem is Σ 0 1 -complete with respect to ď; and Miller III's proof ( [21]) that the isomorphism problem for finitely presented groups is Σ 0 1 -complete with respect to ď. (For other applications of ď to word problems of finitely presented groups see [28].) The first work explicitly tackling ď on ceers was done by Ershov [8], who pointed out important examples of Σ 0 1 -complete ceers, showing also that their degree is join-irreducible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%