2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating whole building energy models: Detailed case study using hourly measured data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphical plots of calibration signature and characteristic signature have also been proposed to guide the parameter tuning process (Liu and Liu, 2011). Due to its iterative nature, the use of version control to keep track of model changes and the reasons for the change has been identified as an important process in order to improve the reproducibility of manual calibration methods (Raftery et al, 2011).…”
Section: Manual Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Graphical plots of calibration signature and characteristic signature have also been proposed to guide the parameter tuning process (Liu and Liu, 2011). Due to its iterative nature, the use of version control to keep track of model changes and the reasons for the change has been identified as an important process in order to improve the reproducibility of manual calibration methods (Raftery et al, 2011).…”
Section: Manual Calibration Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since these calibration criteria are based solely on energy consumption and do not account for uncertainties and inaccuracies of the input parameters, this makes their reliability questionable. Calls have also now been made to use hourly measured data for calibration purposes for the reason that the model would better represent the building's actual performance, since calibration with monthly data could easily miss significant errors at a daily or hourly resolution (Reddy, 2006;Raftery et al, 2011).…”
Section: Assessing Calibration Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designers of integrated control systems for existing buildings usually develop a model relating to the current scenario of the buildings as a first step; then, a calibration methodology is applied to assure accuracy; finally, several opportunities for energy saving supplied by renovation actions and enhanced control systems are assessed based on the same calibrated model (Raftery et al (2011)). In conclusion, whenever enhanced control systems integrated in existing large buildings must be simulated, the use of accurate dynamic simulation tools is mandatory.…”
Section: Simulation Of Integrated Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error (CVRMSE) values were calculated using the formulae suggested by Committee et al (2002), which have been already applied both for the validation of energy models against hourly measurements (Raftery et al (2011)) and for the calibration of transient models based on Modelica/Dymola (Ali et al (2015)):…”
Section: Mean Bias Error (Mbe) and Cumulative Variation Of Root Mean mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods fail when they involve building-to-building comparison when all the compared buildings operate inefficiently and when the methods do not comprehensively take into account each building's unique nature. In the cases where a calibrated wholebuilding energy simulation model exists, measured performance is extremely difficult to compare with predicted performance [9][10][11]. To complicate matters further, measured HVAC time-series data describe building performance in higher resolution but wholly depend upon weather and control strategies [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%