Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3239235.3239236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating use case points using bayesian analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inflexibility of the use case complexity weight level impacts the accuracy of the estimation [10]. Moreover, the original complexity and assigned weight levels might not reflect the actual situations [45]. Fortunately, this was confirmed earlier by Karner [5] that the proposed complexity weight is based on the people's approximation at Objective Systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inflexibility of the use case complexity weight level impacts the accuracy of the estimation [10]. Moreover, the original complexity and assigned weight levels might not reflect the actual situations [45]. Fortunately, this was confirmed earlier by Karner [5] that the proposed complexity weight is based on the people's approximation at Objective Systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of UCP calibration is conducted by Nassif et al [8] and followed by Qi et al [45]. Nassif et al [8] introduced a six-level use case complexity weight instead of a three-level as initially proposed by the original UCP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A FUSP is an extended version of a USP that uses the Fuzzy Set theory to reduce some use case classification problems. Qi et al [35] improved the estimation accuracy of the UCP by using Bayesian analysis to calibrate the case complexity weights. Rak et al [36] proposed a model for effort estimation called Use Case Reusability (UCR).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the three early‐phase transaction‐based effort estimation models proposed in our previous research 5 can be calibrated using the transactions identified from source code with tailored numbers of complexity attributes that are used to define early‐phase estimation models. Providing early‐effort estimates using early‐phase representations of transactions. The transactional information derived using the transaction analysis method proposed in this study is mapped into an abstract transaction model, which has many early phase representations 4,8‐10 . For example, a transaction can be modeled as user‐system interactions identified from use case narratives, as sequences of operations identified from object analysis diagrams, or as sequences of messages identified from sequence diagrams.…”
Section: Post‐development Calibration For Early Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transactional information derived using the transaction analysis method proposed in this study is mapped into an abstract transaction model, which has many early phase representations. 4,[8][9][10] For example, a transaction can be modeled as user-system interactions identified from use case narratives, as sequences of operations identified from object analysis diagrams, or as sequences of messages identified from sequence diagrams. Early effort estimates can be made using those early-phase representations as input of the transaction-based effort estimation models calibrated using source code information.…”
Section: Post-development Calibration For Early Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%