2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1676747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating the Nelson-Siegel-Svensson Model

Abstract: The Nelson-Siegel-Svensson model is widely-used for modelling the yield curve, yet many authors have reported 'numerical difficulties' when calibrating the model. We argue that the problem is twofold: firstly, the optimisation problem is not convex and has multiple local optima. Hence standard methods that are readily available in statistical packages are not appropriate. We implement and test an optimisation heuristic, Differential Evolution, and show that it is capable of reliably solving the model. Secondly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters have been estimated by minimizing the sum of squared errors between market and model prices. We use a gradient descent algorithm with randomly chosen starting values as described in Gilli et al (2010). The optimal parameters are given in Table 5.…”
Section: Parameters Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters have been estimated by minimizing the sum of squared errors between market and model prices. We use a gradient descent algorithm with randomly chosen starting values as described in Gilli et al (2010). The optimal parameters are given in Table 5.…”
Section: Parameters Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: Author's calculations Considering that is a nonlinear parameter and numerically unstable, almost all the authors fixed the value of , Fabozzi, Martellini & Priaulet (2005) used a value of 3 years, and Diebold & Li (2006) fixed a value of 1.3684 years. Gilli, Große, & Schumann (2010) reported numerical difficulties when calibrating the model, particularly they established two problems. The first one is the optimization issue that results from a not convex problem with multiple local minima.…”
Section: Figure 3: Historical Values Of Defined With a Nonlinear Optimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The discussion on numerical issues related to the estimation and calibration of the DNS model can be found in Gilli et al (2010) 7 Following the literature (e.g. Diebold et al, 2006, Diebold andLi, 2002) we refer to empirical counterparts of the estimated factors.…”
Section: The Nelson-siegel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%