2016
DOI: 10.1080/08120099.2016.1233456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating the middle and late Permian palynostratigraphy of Australia to the geologic time-scale via U–Pb zircon CA-IDTIMS dating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
93
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Four analytical sessions (110061,110066,110088,110106) were run with standard zircon using the 18 O − 2 primary beam. Two of these contained zircons of unknown age, the geochronological results of which are published in Laurie et al (2016). The reference materials in those runs consisted of the following:…”
Section: Experiments B: Standard Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four analytical sessions (110061,110066,110088,110106) were run with standard zircon using the 18 O − 2 primary beam. Two of these contained zircons of unknown age, the geochronological results of which are published in Laurie et al (2016). The reference materials in those runs consisted of the following:…”
Section: Experiments B: Standard Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No statistically significant isotopologue disequilibrium trends related to age are observed, but only one session (130058) had OG1 grains analysed, and the extreme age of this reference material (Stern et al, 2009) dominates any age-related statistics. The geochronologic results from unknowns M750 and M736 analysed in session 110088 are given in Laurie et al, (2016) alongside ID-TIMS results for the same samples. The agreement between the SHRIMP ages and the ID-TIMS ages for these samples suggests that the 18 O − 2 primary beam introduces no statistically significant geochronological bias.…”
Section: Experiments B: Standard Zirconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these contained zircons of unknown age, the geochronological results of which are published in Laurie et al (2016). The reference materials in those runs consisted of the following: …”
Section: Experiments B: Standard Zirconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26; The climate record for the Permian in eastern Australia (Fielding et al, 2008;Frank et al, 2015) is confused. This is because: (1) new CA-IDTIMS dating has substantially revised the ages of many units in the Bowen Basin formerly placed in the Guadalupian and Lopingian and now considered Lopingian (Metcalfe et al, 2015Laurie et al, 2016);and (2) ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT…”
Section: Comparison Of East Gondwana Palaeoclimate Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No distinct cyclic pattern in sedimentation is recognized, although the basal mudstone beds above the Poole Sandstone were deposited during marine flooding and the transition to sandstones in the overlying Lightjack Formation forms part of a progradational depositional trend. The upper age limit for the Noonkanbah Formation is constrained by the presence of the Roadian ammonoid Daubichites about 60 m above the base of the Lightjack Formation (Glenister et al, 1993) and IDTIMS dates of 268.1-270.1 Ma for ash beds within this formation (Mory et al, 2012;Laurie et al, 2016). The age of the base of the Noonkanbah Formation is…”
Section: Canning Basin: Noonkanbah Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%