The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating the Cepheid Period–Wesenheit Relation in the Gaia Bands Using Galactic Open-cluster Cepheids

Abstract: Establishing the period–Wesenheit relation requires independent and accurate distance measurements of classical Cepheids (DCEPs). The precise distances provided by associated open clusters independently calibrate the period–Wesenheit relations of DCEPs. 51 DCEPs associated with open clusters are compiled using the constraints of five-dimensional astrometric information. By directly using Gaia data release 3 parallaxes, the period–Wesenheit relation in the Gaia G band is calibrated as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extended the list of magnitudes in anticipation of the vast and various data coming from the Vera Ru- bin and James Webb Space Telescope, which will also target classical Cepheids. The list of Wesenheit indices was extended due to the recent rise in popularity of the period-Wesenheit and period-Wesenheit-metallicity relations from the Gaia data (Lin et al 2022;Ripepi et al 2022), and due to the ongoing discussion about the precision and accuracy of the Hubble-Lemaître constant, H 0 , the value of which was calculated-among othersusing the W H index of classical Cepheids (Riess et al 2022).…”
Section: Extension Of the Synthetic Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extended the list of magnitudes in anticipation of the vast and various data coming from the Vera Ru- bin and James Webb Space Telescope, which will also target classical Cepheids. The list of Wesenheit indices was extended due to the recent rise in popularity of the period-Wesenheit and period-Wesenheit-metallicity relations from the Gaia data (Lin et al 2022;Ripepi et al 2022), and due to the ongoing discussion about the precision and accuracy of the Hubble-Lemaître constant, H 0 , the value of which was calculated-among othersusing the W H index of classical Cepheids (Riess et al 2022).…”
Section: Extension Of the Synthetic Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extended the list of magnitudes in anticipation of the vast and various data coming from the Vera Rubin and James Webb Space Telescope, which will also target classical Cepheids. The list of Wesenheit indices was extended due to the recent rise in popularity of the period-Wesenheit and period-Wesenheitmetallicity relations from Gaia data (Lin et al 2022;Ripepi et al 2022), and due to the ongoing discussion about the precision and accuracy of the Hubble-Lemai ̂tre constant, H 0 , the value of which was calculated-among others-using the W H index of classical Cepheids (Riess et al 2022).…”
Section: Extension Of the Synthetic Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This newly developed method takes advantage of the stars in the OCs all having a similar distance, extinction, age, and metallicity, as well as the fact that the age distribution of OCs (ranging from several million years to several billion years; Kharchenko et al 2013) partially overlaps with the age range of DECPSs. After parallax corrections (Lindegren et al 2021, hereafter L21), this method has been proven to eliminate residual parallax offset (Riess et al 2022;Cruz Reyes & Anderson 2023), resulting in more accurate PWRs and PWZRs (e.g., Breuval et al 2020;Zhou & Chen 2021;Lin et al 2022;Riess et al 2022;Cruz Reyes & Anderson 2023). For example, Riess et al (2022) used 17 OC-DCEPs with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry to calibrate the PWZR in the HST photometric system and determine a precise Hubble constant of H 0 = 73.01 ± 0.99 km s −1 Mpc −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first OC-DCEPs was discovered by Doig (1925), and searches for OC DECPSs have been active in the past decade (Anderson et al 2013;Chen et al 2015;Clark et al 2015;Chen et al 2017;Lohr et al 2018;Alonso-Santiago et al 2020;Breuval et al 2020;Negueruela et al 2020;Medina et al 2021;Zhou & Chen 2021;Hao et al 2022;Lin et al 2022;Cruz Reyes & Anderson 2023). Recently, there have been new searches for OCs (e.g., Hunt & Reffert 2023) based on Gaia data release 3 (DR3; Collaboration et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%