2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating Out-of-Equilibrium Electron–Phonon Couplings in Photoexcited MoS2

Abstract: Nonequilibrium electron−phonon coupling (EPC) serves as a dominant interaction in a multitude of transient processes, including photoinduced phase transitions, coherent phonon generation, and possible light-induced superconductivity.Here we use monolayer MoS 2 as a prototype to investigate the variation in electron−phonon couplings under laser excitation, on the basis of real-time time-dependent density functional theory simulations. Phonon softening, anisotropic modification of the deformation potential, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the potential energy surface of the ground state becomes more flat and asymmetrical leading to a displaced equilibrium position following the photoexcitation (see Figure 4b). [ 37–39 ] Based on these considerations, we have then estimated for the different Bragg reflections the structure factor changes resulting from in‐plane and out‐of‐ plane displacements of S and Mo atoms following the direction of motion consistent with A 1 ′ and E ′ modes (see Figure 4c–e and Section S1 of Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the potential energy surface of the ground state becomes more flat and asymmetrical leading to a displaced equilibrium position following the photoexcitation (see Figure 4b). [ 37–39 ] Based on these considerations, we have then estimated for the different Bragg reflections the structure factor changes resulting from in‐plane and out‐of‐ plane displacements of S and Mo atoms following the direction of motion consistent with A 1 ′ and E ′ modes (see Figure 4c–e and Section S1 of Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,35] In contrast, FM would result from the oscillating energy levels due to the Fröhlich interaction of longitudinal optical phonons and deformation potential interaction of longitudinal acoustic phonons with charge carriers. [36][37][38][39][40][41] In simpler terms, the oscillating lattice deformations associated with the phonons modulate the energy of carriers in the lattice. In hybrid materials, this causes the energy levels at the interface of the organic and inorganic to shift periodically relative to one another, which can cause the carrier population to oscillate between the organic and inorganic components.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a new approach has emerged that allows in situ manipulation: driving systems out of equilibrium by irradiating them with light. The femtosecond laser technique has become an appealing approach to exploring ultrafast changes and manipulations of material properties owing to the recent advances in ultrafast time-resolved diffraction techniques that combine ultrafast temporal manipulation with atomic-scale spatial resolution. The photoexcitation induces a nonequilibrium occupation of excited electronic states, which could lead to periodic lattice distortions and expose the transient metastable states. , This approach shows promising applications in demagnetization, inducing ferromagnetism, , enhancing magnetic exchange interactions, and manipulating magnetically ordered properties in two-dimensional materials. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum widths of the forbidden bands of the R-stacked and M-stacked BLC are 1.21 and 1.16 eV, respectively. Based on the semiconductor nature of BLC and previous works, we simulated the real-time evolution of the structure and electronic states of the R-stacked BLC under a series of Gaussian light fields with a given frequency of ℏω = 1.55 eV and different electric field strengths. More comparisons of parameters are discussed in Note S1 of the Supporting Information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation