The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1306/02031413060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibrating discrete fracture-network models with a carbonate three-dimensional outcrop fracture network: Implications for naturally fractured reservoir modeling

Abstract: A B S T R A C TModeling naturally fractured reservoirs requires a detailed understanding of the three-dimensional (3D) fracture-network characteristics, whereas generally only one-dimensional (1D) data, often suffering from sampling artifacts, are available as inputs for modeling. Additional fracture properties can be derived from outcrop analogs with the scanline method, but it does not capture their full two-dimensional (2D) characteristics. We propose an improved workflow based on a 2D field-digitizing tool… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of sampling any fracture is controlled in part by the borehole orientation (Dershowitz, ; Davy et al, ; Terzaghi, ), so extrapolating the volumetric (3‐D) fracture density from borehole traces is important to account for undersampled fractures (Dershowitz, ). While fully capturing the variability of fracture spacing is a complex task that requires a large number of boreholes (Bisdom et al, ), estimating the 3‐D fracture density may be particularly important when evaluating relations with hydraulic properties. Here, we adopt the p xy ‐system convention from Dershowitz and Herda () and applied simple stereological rules (Fox et al, ; Wang, ) to derive the volumetric fracture density, p 32 .…”
Section: Field Setting and Subsurface Test Facility Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of sampling any fracture is controlled in part by the borehole orientation (Dershowitz, ; Davy et al, ; Terzaghi, ), so extrapolating the volumetric (3‐D) fracture density from borehole traces is important to account for undersampled fractures (Dershowitz, ). While fully capturing the variability of fracture spacing is a complex task that requires a large number of boreholes (Bisdom et al, ), estimating the 3‐D fracture density may be particularly important when evaluating relations with hydraulic properties. Here, we adopt the p xy ‐system convention from Dershowitz and Herda () and applied simple stereological rules (Fox et al, ; Wang, ) to derive the volumetric fracture density, p 32 .…”
Section: Field Setting and Subsurface Test Facility Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, outcrop fracture studies are an essential element in a strategy for learning about fracture patterns existing at depth. Outcrop fracture mapping is undergoing a renaissance owing to recent advances in remote sensing, drone-based imaging, advanced image processing, and feature extraction of outcrop-based data sets (Bisdom et al, 2014(Bisdom et al, , 2017Hardebol & Bertotti, 2013;Healy et al, 2017;Madjid et al, 2018;Pollyea & Fairley, 2011;Wüstefeld et al, 2018).…”
Section: Problems and Advantages Of Outcrop Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, calibrating the uncertainty by matching monitoring data which is known as "inversion process" is crucial for forecast job (Chen et al 2018). Although some work about calibrating fractured geological model has been done such as quantifying the uncertainty of hydraulic tests in fractured rocks based on a geostatistical approach (Bisdom et al 2014;Blessent et al 2011;Zhang et al 2016b), there are a few studies of inversing the complex fracture model properties for both theory and application. For this reason, we are working on quantifying the uncertainty of the complex fracture model for subsurface flow based on the Bayesian formulation and we mainly focus on the two-dimensional fracture model at present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open fractures and veins in flat-lying carbonates in the Potiguar Basin(Bisdom et al 2014), box region A represents "Pattern A" fracture system, ellipse region B represents "Pattern B" fracture system…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%