1955
DOI: 10.1002/cne.901030208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caliber spectra of dental nerves in dogs and cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10) it is clear that many units slowed by more than 30 %, and in these cases it is likely that the fibres became thinner in the tooth. Cooling and tapering of nerves in the teeth would account for the lack of correspondence between the mean conduction velocities in the peripheral portions of pulpal afferents measured here and the diameters of nerves in the toothpulp observed histologically (Brookhart, Livingston & Haugen, 1953;Graf & Hjelmquist, 1955;Johnsen & Karlsson, 1974;Beasley & Holland, 1978). The fact that a proportion of the pulpal afferents tested could not be excited from the main sensory nucleus or the nucleus caudalis, or both, does not necessarily indicate that these nerves did not project to those areas; the stimulating electrodes may not have been close enough to the nerves to excite them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…10) it is clear that many units slowed by more than 30 %, and in these cases it is likely that the fibres became thinner in the tooth. Cooling and tapering of nerves in the teeth would account for the lack of correspondence between the mean conduction velocities in the peripheral portions of pulpal afferents measured here and the diameters of nerves in the toothpulp observed histologically (Brookhart, Livingston & Haugen, 1953;Graf & Hjelmquist, 1955;Johnsen & Karlsson, 1974;Beasley & Holland, 1978). The fact that a proportion of the pulpal afferents tested could not be excited from the main sensory nucleus or the nucleus caudalis, or both, does not necessarily indicate that these nerves did not project to those areas; the stimulating electrodes may not have been close enough to the nerves to excite them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…These differences could be attributed to the variation in the sensitivity of guaging methods used, or other unknown factors. Most of the size studies on animals (Graf and Hjelmquist 1955;Johnsen and Karlsson 1974;Beasley and Holland 1978;Fried and Hildebrand 1981;Holland and Robinson 1983;Hoffmeister and Schendel 1986) consistently revealed smaller myelinated nerve fibers than those reported here for human premolars. However, Hirvonen (1987) reported an average circumference of 12.5 gm for myelinated nerves in the dog's canine teeth, which is more consistent with the human data presented in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Available data relate to e.g., anterior teeth of cats (Johnson and Karlsson 1974;Beasley and Holland 1978;Fried and Hildebrand 1981;Holland and Robinson 1983;Noga and Correspondence to: P.N.R. Nair , dogs (Graf and Hjelmquist 1955;Hirvonen 1987), bovines (Graf and Hjelmquist 1955) and marmoset monkeys (Bueltmann et al 1972). Hoffmeister and Schendel (1986) reported the number of toothnerves entering mandibular teeth (incisors, canines, premolars and molars) of one cat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of myelinated and non-myelinated fibres has R N. R. Nair (~) 9 H. E. Schroeder Institute of Oral Structural Biology, Centre for Dental and Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland long been established in mammalian teeth (Matthews et al 1959;Uchizono and Homma 1959;Miyoshi et al 1966), quantitative morphological studies on various classes of pulpal nerve fibres are rare. The available data relate mostly to rodent (Naftel et al 1994), feline (Johnsen and Karlsson 1974;Beasley and Holland 1978;Fried and Hildebrand 1981;Holland and Robinson 1983;Noga and Holland 1983;Hoffmeister and Schendel 1986), canine (Graf and Hjelmquist 1955;Hirvonen 1987), bovine (Graf and Hjelmquist 1955) and simian (Bueltmann et al 1972) teeth. Similar data on human intradental axons are scarce (Graf and Bj6rlin 1951;Johnsen and Johns 1978;Reader and Foreman 1981;Johnsen et al 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%