2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.024410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of the susceptibility of interacting superparamagnetic particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

18
216
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
18
216
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One indication that such interactions are indeed absent comes from the agreement between experimental and calculated data for χ(T ) in the superparamagnetic regime, where we observe the predicted slightly steeper than 1/T decrease, while calculations show that interactions would considerably flatten this decrease [47]. On the other hand, the absence of interactions can also be rationalized by comparing the island switching field H sw , the applied field H , and the stray field H dipol , created by all other islands at the location of one island.…”
Section: Quantifying the Contribution Of Perimeter Vs Surface Atoms mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One indication that such interactions are indeed absent comes from the agreement between experimental and calculated data for χ(T ) in the superparamagnetic regime, where we observe the predicted slightly steeper than 1/T decrease, while calculations show that interactions would considerably flatten this decrease [47]. On the other hand, the absence of interactions can also be rationalized by comparing the island switching field H sw , the applied field H , and the stray field H dipol , created by all other islands at the location of one island.…”
Section: Quantifying the Contribution Of Perimeter Vs Surface Atoms mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Interactions dominate the properties for small applied fields since it is expected that the applied field would dominate over the nearest-neighbor interactions as the system approaches saturation. 47 On the other hand, such dipolar interactions impinge on the ZFC magnetothermal curves as follows: at the beginning, when the sample is being cooled down, the magnetic moments of the particles present a disordered state and are randomly oriented. As the temperature increases, the particle moments tend to orientate along the direction of the field, which increases the magnetization following a particle distribution of energy barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 On the other hand, the existence of spin-glasslike phase in particle systems, observing an ϳH 2/3 dependence, has been pointed as a result of diverging relaxation times, attributed to competing interactions between surface spins ͑thus, disorder showed by a spin-glass phase shell surrounding a defined magnetic core͒. 4,12 In this case, if the spin-glasslike state would be due only to the existence of a frozen state of spins at the surface, this behavior would be observed as well in the ASD-25 sample, which presents an interface forming Fe-N bonds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At T Ͼ 65 K, the decrease in the magnetization when increasing temperature is much smoother than the observed for B-sample in both fields TRM curves. This behavior suggests that strong correlation between particles affects the remanence decay 21,22 in such a way that magnetization is maintained throughout a wide range of temperatures. In this case, magnetic interparticle interactions indicate that partial oxidation at room conditions does not provide a physical decoupling of the magnetic grains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%