2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.012706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculations of positronium-atom scattering using a spherical cavity

Abstract: Positronium (Ps) scattering by noble-gas atoms (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe) is studied in the frozen-target approximation and with inclusion of the van der Waals interaction. Single-particle electron and positron states in the field of the target atom are calculated, with the system enclosed by a hard spherical wall. The two-particle Ps wave function is expanded in these states, and the Hamiltonian matrix is diagonalized, giving the Ps energy levels in the cavity. Scattering phase shifts, scattering lengths, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
66
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(265 reference statements)
5
66
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As first applications of the theory, we calculate phase shifts, elastic-scattering and momentum-transfer cross sections, and the pickoff annihilation rate 1 Z eff for Ps on He and Ne. The cross sections are found to be in agreement with previous coupled-state [17] and model van der Waals [7] calculations. By accounting for And another one:…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As first applications of the theory, we calculate phase shifts, elastic-scattering and momentum-transfer cross sections, and the pickoff annihilation rate 1 Z eff for Ps on He and Ne. The cross sections are found to be in agreement with previous coupled-state [17] and model van der Waals [7] calculations. By accounting for And another one:…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The MBT results for the momentum-transfer cross section [ Fig. 5 (c) and (d)], are close to the FT+vdW calculation [7], particularly for K > 0.3 a.u. For He, our calculation is within the error bars of the experimental result of Nagashima et al [44] but ∼30-45% larger than that of Canter et al [40], Rytsola et al [41], and Coleman et al [42].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations