1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00862021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the ?initial? thickness of the ?microlayer? during bubble boiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Jung & Kim (2018), the theoretical data plot was obtained by considering the growth exponent n to be 0.5 for both Reynolds numbers. The theoretical models reported by Olander & Watts (1969), Van Ouwerkerk (1971 and Smirnov (1975) overpredict the values of the initial microlayer thickness in comparison to the present experimental data. The solid line represents the prediction plot proposed by Jung & Kim (2018), which is in close agreement with the present experimental data (till the maximum microlayer thickness) for both flow rates.…”
Section: Initial Microlayer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Jung & Kim (2018), the theoretical data plot was obtained by considering the growth exponent n to be 0.5 for both Reynolds numbers. The theoretical models reported by Olander & Watts (1969), Van Ouwerkerk (1971 and Smirnov (1975) overpredict the values of the initial microlayer thickness in comparison to the present experimental data. The solid line represents the prediction plot proposed by Jung & Kim (2018), which is in close agreement with the present experimental data (till the maximum microlayer thickness) for both flow rates.…”
Section: Initial Microlayer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In one of the recent works, Jung & Kim (2018) modified the hydrodynamic model of Smirnov (1975) by including the effects of surface tension, the non-hemispherical shape of the vapour bubble and residual flow inside the microlayer. The modified model obtained by Jung & Kim (2018) for the estimation of initial microlayer thickness is given by…”
Section: Initial Microlayer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we have ascertained that the simple model of Cooper & Lloyd (1969), or variations thereof, cannot describe the thickness distribution with sufficient accuracy. Conversely, the analytical solution of Smirnov (1975), modified according to the arguments presented by Jung & Kim (2018), as well as our own reasoning, captures the distribution very well over a broad range of fluid properties and Jakob numbers. We have also highlighted the effect of the mean Weber number for Scriven growth on microlayer dynamics, and argued that, for vanishingly small Jakob numbers, the microlayer can remain of negligible extent, even under conditions favourable to its formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A more detailed analysis of the IMT problem has been performed by Smirnov (1975), the result of which reads, in compact form,…”
Section: Initial Microlayer Thickness Sensitivity Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early analytical works (Cooper and Lloyd, 1969, Olander and Watts, 1969, Van Ouwerkerk, 1971, Smirnov, 1975, Van Stralen et al, 1975 try to derive an expression for the hydrodynamic microlayer thickness from modelling the flow in the region around the outer edge of the bubble as it expands over the wall. The analyses typically assume a perfect hemispherical shape of the bubble and focus on the pure hydrodynamics of microlayer formation neglecting any depletion by evaporation.…”
Section: 'Physically-based' Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%