1981
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(81)90374-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of the absolute peak efficiency of gamma-ray detectors for different counting geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
7

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
62
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration of the moderated 3 He proportional counter was made by measurement on the sea level ground, where the cosmic neutron dose rate has been determined in our previous study [6]. The absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector with respective to the earth distributed source or to the ground surface source was determined by the effective solid angle concept proposed by Moens et al [7,8], according to which the absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector to a distributed source can be calculated from the measured reference point-source efficiency multiplied by the ratio of effective solid angle subtended by the detecor over the distributed source to that subtended by the detector at the reference point source.…”
Section: Calibration Of Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration of the moderated 3 He proportional counter was made by measurement on the sea level ground, where the cosmic neutron dose rate has been determined in our previous study [6]. The absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector with respective to the earth distributed source or to the ground surface source was determined by the effective solid angle concept proposed by Moens et al [7,8], according to which the absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector to a distributed source can be calculated from the measured reference point-source efficiency multiplied by the ratio of effective solid angle subtended by the detecor over the distributed source to that subtended by the detector at the reference point source.…”
Section: Calibration Of Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backside of the foils at the angles of 45° and 135° was covered with Aldrich cadmium foil with a purity of 99.9998% and dimensions of 2.5×2.5×0.15 cm 3 . This was done to protect these copper foils from activation due to neutrons which did not come directly from the sample.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In step three, the effective geometric counting efficiency of the detector for the sample is calculated, using the simulated n(r), taking the gamma-attenuation in the sample material into account. Basically, MOENS' effective solid-angle method 3 is applied for each volume voxel, the resulting correction factor multiplied with the local neutron density, and the volume integral taken. The result is a photon-energy dependent correction factor that takes both neutron self-shielding and gamma self-absorption into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of Engineering Physics, École Polytechnique de Montréal), using their equipment. It uses gamma ray emission, transmission and detection, a technique often used in others industrial processes (Moens 1981). Gamma rays are used instead of x-ray devices (e.g.…”
Section: Testing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%