2016
DOI: 10.17580/cisisr.2016.01.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of stacking fault energy and its influence on abrasive wear resistance of Hadfield cast steel cooled at different rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth noting that the elements that make up austenitic steels, according to the degree of influence on SFE are divided into two types: elements increasing and decreasing its value. It is also known that the stacking-fault energy of austenitic steels is in direct ratio to the deformation temperature, and the grain size of austenite is in invers ratio [25,26].…”
Section: Influence Of the Stacking-fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noting that the elements that make up austenitic steels, according to the degree of influence on SFE are divided into two types: elements increasing and decreasing its value. It is also known that the stacking-fault energy of austenitic steels is in direct ratio to the deformation temperature, and the grain size of austenite is in invers ratio [25,26].…”
Section: Influence Of the Stacking-fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a surface hardening is observed in zone 2, this is not desirable. Kolokolsev et al [10] have reported that the decrease in SFE decreases resistance to wear. ; to minimize decarburization during heat treatment, additions of 2.5 percent chromium are common [11].…”
Section: Outer Surface (Zone 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those equations, ρ is the molar surface density along {111} planes, ∆G γ→ε , the molar Gibbs energy of the transformation γ/ε, σ the surface energy of the interface γ/ε, a, the lattice parameter, N, the Avogadro number, R, the gas constant, T, the deformation temperature, β ϕ , the magnetic moment, x i , the atomic fraction, and d, the grain size in microns. Several contributions have been made to the relationships between SFE, microstructure [5,6], and grain size [9], and wear resistance [10,11]. Similarly, the effect of strain rate by impact through shot peeing [12,13], and explosive hardening [14,15] on the microstructure in austenitic steels with 12 mJ m −2 < SFE < 35 mJ m −2 has been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbasi et al [9] studied the abrasive wear behaviour of Al-alloyed Hadfield steel under both high- and low-stress wear conditions in comparison with that of non-Al alloyed Hadfield steel. Kolokoltsev et al [10] studied the resistance of Hadfield steel cooled at different rates. El-Fawkhry et al and Kalandyk et al [11], [12] both discussed the results of austenitic matrix modification in high-manganese steel castings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%