2003
DOI: 10.2514/1.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Rotor Blade-Vortex Interaction Airloads Using a Multiple-Trailer Free-Wake Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the heavier blades exhibit higher peak-topeak deflections for the case with HART II blades [20], which have similar dynamic characteristics with HART I blades. For MN and MV cases, the predicted results by Lim et al [9] show locally good agreements with the measured data, but the waveforms are biased to the advancing side (MN) or to the retreating side (MV), resulting in different waveforms with the measured blade responses. It should be mentioned that Lim et al [9] used slightly different set of structural properties where the DEI data were used for the blade uniform section while HART II blade properties were adopted in the root section.…”
Section: Trim and Blade Motionssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that the heavier blades exhibit higher peak-topeak deflections for the case with HART II blades [20], which have similar dynamic characteristics with HART I blades. For MN and MV cases, the predicted results by Lim et al [9] show locally good agreements with the measured data, but the waveforms are biased to the advancing side (MN) or to the retreating side (MV), resulting in different waveforms with the measured blade responses. It should be mentioned that Lim et al [9] used slightly different set of structural properties where the DEI data were used for the blade uniform section while HART II blade properties were adopted in the root section.…”
Section: Trim and Blade Motionssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The correlation of the present elastic twist predictions, against the measured data as well as predicted results by Lim et al [9], is presented in Figure 12 for the three test cases, respectively. The present predictions show good agreements with the measured data in terms of both magnitudes and phases, with a slight under-estimation of the peak-topeak values for MN and MV cases.…”
Section: Trim and Blade Motionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations