1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02516241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of primary nuclear interferences occurring in neutron activation analysis with a slowpoke reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, their calculated values agree well with the values calculated in this work, which is to be expected since the two reactors have similar fast-to-thermal neutron-flux ratios (1,9).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…In general, their calculated values agree well with the values calculated in this work, which is to be expected since the two reactors have similar fast-to-thermal neutron-flux ratios (1,9).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Among activation techniques, we have already used irradiation in gamma photons through the 14 ( , )13 reaction (1,2). This method requires an electron accelerator, which may not be readily available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific activities (counts/microgram for each activated nuclide) were determined for each counting period, and the masses of the various elements in both NBS standards and TORT-1 were determined via an adaptation of the comparator (semiabsolute) method for INAA (2), that is, by dividing the photopeak areas of the unknowns by the specific activities of the relevant radionuclides. Deadtime corrections (3) for the decay of short-lived radioisotopes in the presence of active, longer-lived isotopes such as 24Na and 38C1 were applied to each peak; in addition, a correction factor for random summing effects was calculated and applied following the procedure of Wyttenbach (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blank values were subtracted from results. Twenty per cent of the neutron #ux in our reactor is due to fast neutrons which may cause nuclear interferences (Zikovsky and Galinier, 1981;Kennedy et al, 1986). A computer program was used to subtract these interferences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%