, discussing leaflets and sinuses as separate components of the root instead of interchangeably referring to both as ''cusps''), including recognizing the deficiencies in commonly used classifications for the congenitally malformed aortic valve. This deficiency includes the often underrecognized unicuspid and unicommissural aortic valve, 2 which was not assessed, or possibly not appreciated, in the given account. Although objective data to support the best methods for 2D assessment and continued monitoring of asymmetric aortic roots in congenitally malformed aortic valves are currently absent, we should nonetheless aim our sights higher. It is now commonplace to view cardiac anatomy in three dimensions using multiple imaging modalities. Ideally, the imager could reliably follow aortic root volumes for a more accurate assessment, especially given that the aortic root dilates not just circumferentially but also longitudinally. 2 In the meantime, would not MRI or computed tomographic 2D areas prove more accurate? Such normative data in adults as assessed by MRI have already been supplied. 4 Could biplane TTE provide similar accuracy in measuring short-axis areas? The work is clearly laid out for improved understanding in assessment of aortic root dimensions, and we are thankful to Vis et al. 1 for pushing forward this topic, which holds clear clinical significance.