2001
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1005091361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of noncrossing probabilities for Poisson processes and its corollaries

Abstract: The paper describes a new numerical method for the calculation of noncrossing probabilities for arbitrary boundaries by a Poisson process. We find the method to be simple in implementation, quick and efficient - it works reliably for Poisson processes of very high intensity n, up to several thousand. Hence, it can be used to detect unusual features in the finite-sample behaviour of empirical process and trace it down to very high sample sizes. It also can be used as a good approximation for noncrossing probabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the noise distribution is known, standard Monte-Carlo simulations can be used to estimate the α-quantile of HC n for finite sample size. Alternatively, you can find finite recursion formulas for the exact finite distribution in the paper of Khmaladze and Shinjikashvili [27].…”
Section: Power Of the Higher Criticism Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the noise distribution is known, standard Monte-Carlo simulations can be used to estimate the α-quantile of HC n for finite sample size. Alternatively, you can find finite recursion formulas for the exact finite distribution in the paper of Khmaladze and Shinjikashvili [27].…”
Section: Power Of the Higher Criticism Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit distribution of d n is given, e.g., in Shiryaev (1999, p. 251) and Borodin and Salminen (2002), and was calculated by Shinjikashvili using the numerical method of Khmaladze and Shinjikashvili (2001). For tables of the limit distribution of o 2 n see Orlov (1972) or Martynov (1977), while for A 2 n see Deheuvels and Martynov (2003).…”
Section: Assessment Of Convergence Of the New Process W Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this lemma, we have the asymptotically distribution free test. See Khmaladze and Shinjikashvili (2001) and references therein for explicite/ numerical expression for the distribution of the limit sup t∈[0,1] |B t | which is necessary for computing p-values.…”
Section: Goodness Of Fit Testmentioning
confidence: 99%