1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00872449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of mean pore size in porous materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, an equivalent spherical shape is assumed, but other representations have been proposed such as cage-like/spherical mesoporous structure, non-spherical particles, etc. [17,18,19,20,21]. Since the pores do not all have the same size and/or geometry, some statistical analysis must be performed using a model such as nonlinear optimization and Monte Carlo integration, to get a representation of the pore size distribution [22].…”
Section: Morphological and Performance Characterization Of Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an equivalent spherical shape is assumed, but other representations have been proposed such as cage-like/spherical mesoporous structure, non-spherical particles, etc. [17,18,19,20,21]. Since the pores do not all have the same size and/or geometry, some statistical analysis must be performed using a model such as nonlinear optimization and Monte Carlo integration, to get a representation of the pore size distribution [22].…”
Section: Morphological and Performance Characterization Of Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%