2020
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2020.1823508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of mean excitation energies of 3d-elements and their cations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N is the number of electrons bound to the considered ion, r i is the radial coordinate of the ion, ρ (r i ) is the electron density distribution, which is assumed to be spherically symmetric around the nucleus, ω 0 (r i ) is the local plasma frequency of the electron gas in the ion [42] and F is a correction factor derived by fitting the LPA to the results from Sauer et al [28,29]:…”
Section: Appendix B Meementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where N is the number of electrons bound to the considered ion, r i is the radial coordinate of the ion, ρ (r i ) is the electron density distribution, which is assumed to be spherically symmetric around the nucleus, ω 0 (r i ) is the local plasma frequency of the electron gas in the ion [42] and F is a correction factor derived by fitting the LPA to the results from Sauer et al [28,29]:…”
Section: Appendix B Meementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires the mean excitation energy (MEE) for tungsten ions, which is not available neither from measurements nor from present ab-initio theoretical calculations. MEE was calculated with an approach based on the local plasma approximation (LPA) corrected to fit the results from Sauer et al [27][28][29]. More detailed comments on the selection of ADAS coefficients and MEE calculation can be found in appendices A and B.…”
Section: Tungsten Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its determination from first principles calculations is a considerable challenge, so except for elements that do not require relativistic corrections, hω Z0,s is generally obtained from empirical laws constrained by measurements for neutral atoms only [55][56][57][58]. Recent advanced calculations carried out by a non-relativistic multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) code have allowed us to estimate hω Z0,s for all ionization states of the elements lighter than argon Z s ⩽ 18 [14,15,59]. Although this result represents considerable progress, the accurate determination of hω Z0,s for many higher-Z elements, such as tungsten, is still missing, which makes it difficult to study the impact of inelastic processes by electronion interaction in a hot plasma.…”
Section: Mean Excitation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the atomic processes that must be described in the CODE and LUKE kinetics codes are rather similar, some differences specific to hot plasmas must be investigated. Indeed, while the atomic physics of argon and elements with lower Z s values has been thoroughly studied by quantum nonrelativistic codes describing the ground-state and mean excitation energies for different ionization states [12][13][14][15], the knowledge of atomic properties for metallic elements with higher Z s values, and in particular for tungsten, is much more sparse. This is a consequence of the relativistic effects and the resulting complex orbital coupling, which must be fully incorporated in quantum calculations, making them considerably more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%