2002
DOI: 10.1007/s006050200022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of Improper Integrals Using (nα)-Sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in [3] give us information about these products in the case when y ∈ Q and x / ∈ L, but we were not able to find any general results in the existing literature. In any case, even if one were able to prove convergence of the series (14) for a more general class of parameter α, it would not imply that the series converges to p(x), see the discussion on page 7.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Results in [3] give us information about these products in the case when y ∈ Q and x / ∈ L, but we were not able to find any general results in the existing literature. In any case, even if one were able to prove convergence of the series (14) for a more general class of parameter α, it would not imply that the series converges to p(x), see the discussion on page 7.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For the case for some best approximation denominator q the product already was considered in [9, 39], and in much more general form in [3] (see also [37]). In particular, it follows from the results given there thatwhen q runs through the sequence of best approximation denominators.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the purpose of the present paper to describe generalizations of Theorem 1.1 without this assumption. Comparison with the paper's precursor [1] will show the reader that we have reused many ideas and Theorem 1.1 is contained in our results as a special case. However, our generalizations are far from straightforward and finding them required a careful analysis and further developments of the proofs given in [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the case of sequences of shape ({kα}) k≥1 this condition is equivalent to the boundedness of the continued fraction expansion of α.) In a joint paper with J. Schoißengeier [1] we proved the following generalization of Oskolkov's result: In Theorem 1.1 we assumed that the singularities of the function f are all at rational points β and we made crucial use of this assumption in the proof of the implication (1)⇒(3). It is the purpose of the present paper to describe generalizations of Theorem 1.1 without this assumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%