2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of electron scattering cross sections for Anthracene, Pyridine and Warfarin molecules over energy range 10–30000 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IAM-SCAR elastic DCS at 90 eV is supposed to be accurate to within 10%, as deduced from comparisons with accurate DCS measurements for different aromatic molecules and other halogenated compounds [24,25]. We have not found any experimental DCS data for pyridine at around 100 eV, but the recent calculation from Gholami et al [26] shows a reasonable agreement with the present calculation at 100 eV. Assuming that the calculated IAM-SCAR DCS at 90 eV are correct, a possible reason for the discrepancy between the experimental and simulated electron transport results in Figure 10 may be lack of effectiveness of the magnetic field to confining the electron beam at that relatively high energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The IAM-SCAR elastic DCS at 90 eV is supposed to be accurate to within 10%, as deduced from comparisons with accurate DCS measurements for different aromatic molecules and other halogenated compounds [24,25]. We have not found any experimental DCS data for pyridine at around 100 eV, but the recent calculation from Gholami et al [26] shows a reasonable agreement with the present calculation at 100 eV. Assuming that the calculated IAM-SCAR DCS at 90 eV are correct, a possible reason for the discrepancy between the experimental and simulated electron transport results in Figure 10 may be lack of effectiveness of the magnetic field to confining the electron beam at that relatively high energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This optical potential generally takes into account four potentials namely: electrostatic interaction potential, exchange potential, correlation-polarization potential and imaginary absorption potential. The procedures used for calculating these interaction potentials are described elsewhere [2].…”
Section: Electron Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various radiation sources could be used in radiotherapy, in some cases electrons as incident beams are utilized [1]. The interaction of these electrons with the DNA bases could eventually lead to single and double-strand breaks in DNA, therefore, such types of radiation are used in radiotherapy to destroy cancer cells [2]. In this research, we intended to combine these two therapy methods in a physical approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the interactions between electron and the local free-electron gas as binary collisions, the cross section σ bc (E L , ρ e , Δ) accounts for these collisions involving energy transfer greater than a certain energy gap Δ [47]. If a projectile loses its energy larger than the first inelastic threshold then excitation of the target atom is possible, which is the reason to take into account the energy gap Δ [40,46].…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%