Calculation of dose distribution in compressible breast tissues using finite element modeling, Monte Carlo simulation and thermoluminescence dosimeters

Abstract

Compression is a technique to immobilize the target or improve the dose distribution within the treatment volume during different irradiation techniques such as AccuBoost(®) brachytherapy. However, there is no systematic method for determination of dose distribution for uncompressed tissue after irradiation under compression. In this study, the mechanical behavior of breast tissue between compressed and uncompressed states was investigated. With that, a novel method was developed to determine the dose distribution in uncompressed tissue after irradiation of compressed breast tissue. Dosimetry was performed using two different methods, namely, Monte Carlo simulations using the MCNP5 code and measurements using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The displacement of the breast elements was simulated using a finite element model and calculated using ABAQUS software. From these results, the 3D dose distribution in uncompressed tissue was determined. The geometry of the model was constructed from magnetic resonance images of six different women volunteers. The mechanical properties were modeled by using the Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material model. Experimental dosimetry was performed by placing the TLD chips into the polyvinyl alcohol breast equivalent phantom. The results determined that the nodal displacements, due to the gravitational force and the 60 Newton compression forces (with 43% contraction in the loading direction and 37% expansion in the orthogonal direction) were determined. Finally, a comparison of the experimental data and the simulated data showed agreement within 11.5% ± 5.9%.

A Biomimetic Approach for Designing a Full External Breast Prosthesis: Post-Mastectomy

“…In addition, the prosthesis shows a good distribution of stress. [44], 14 [24] It can be observed that the displacement values (in the proposed prosthesis) are within the results reported by similar research. The differences presented in the values are due to the dimensions, materials and conditions of each computational model or experimental model that were used.…”

“…[20]. There are diverse scientific and technological advances in the literature that provide computational models and finite element models focused on simulating the mammary gland for preclinical evaluation, prevention, training, diagnostic [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] or on analyzing the biomaterials used for implant reconstruction [14,15,32]. In the case of the most advanced computational models of a breast for the simulation of the anatomy is the anthropomorphic software breast phantom.…”

Systematic Review of Intensity-Modulated Brachytherapy (IMBT): Static and Dynamic Techniques

“…1H). [102][103][104][105] For rectal cancer, several articles have discussed ICMA with a central shielding rod (tungsten, 8 mm in diameter, surrounded by 8 channels through which 192 Ir sources can be translated; Fig. 1G).…”

A New Method on Kerma Estimation in Mammography Screenings

“…The advantage of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is good accuracy, as they are trained by the data of different centers [10] and in a large number and measure the air kerma automatically so that in the mentioned model, there is no need to dosimeter and trained operators and is also more user-friendly. Furthermore, it decreases the computational error and the difference between the absorbed dose measured by dosimetry and computational method of Monte-Carlo simulation method [11].…”