The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.21105/astro.1912.12269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of distances in cosmological models with small-scale inhomogeneities and their use in observational cosmology: a review

Abstract: The Universe is not completely homogeneous. Even if it is sufficiently so on large scales, it is very inhomogeneous at small scales, and this has an effect on light propagation, so that the distance as a function of redshift, which in many cases is defined via light propagation, can differ from the homogeneous case. Simple models can take this into account. I review the history of this idea, its generalization to a wide variety of cosmological models, analytic solutions of simple models, comparison of such sol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
(321 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental question of whether the average D(z) is the same as the D(z) of the average Universe goes back more than 50 years, when Zel'dovich (1964) and Feynman (in a colloquium given at Caltech the same year) 1 suggested the following: if the Universe is lumpy, then a typical light beam should mostly propagate through under-dense regions, and thereby be de-focussed with respect to FLRW; this should imply that D(z) is actually biased up. Many developments and counter-arguments followed from that seminal idea; we refer the interested reader to the introduction of Kaiser & Peacock (2016, hereafter KP16) and the comprehensive review by Helbig (2020) for details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental question of whether the average D(z) is the same as the D(z) of the average Universe goes back more than 50 years, when Zel'dovich (1964) and Feynman (in a colloquium given at Caltech the same year) 1 suggested the following: if the Universe is lumpy, then a typical light beam should mostly propagate through under-dense regions, and thereby be de-focussed with respect to FLRW; this should imply that D(z) is actually biased up. Many developments and counter-arguments followed from that seminal idea; we refer the interested reader to the introduction of Kaiser & Peacock (2016, hereafter KP16) and the comprehensive review by Helbig (2020) for details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One constraint that any acceptable model should satisfy is that the variations in extinction, across different lines of sight at the same redshift, must be small, because of the small photometric scatter around the mean that is observed for type Ia SNe. This requirement parallels the situation with gravitational lensing of type Ia SNe: the small observed dispersion in fluxes places an upper limit on the mass of the elementary lumps of matter, such that the luminosity distance is well approximated by that of a homogeneous universe (Metcalf & Silk 1999;Zumalacárregui & Seljak 2018;Helbig 2020). The latter condition is satisfied if we expect to have a number 𝑁 1 elementary lumps of matter within the "beam" -i.e.…”
Section: Extinction Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…As a future work, a more thorough analysis is needed using inhomogeneous cosmological metrics. Several interesting works evaluate the luminosity distance in inhomogeneous cosmological models [62]. However, in all these works that include a CC, this CC takes the same value in the different parts of the Universe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%