2005
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2005.1413630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of detection and false alarm probabilities in spectrum pooling systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known from [15] that, for a target false alarm probability , an increase in the sensing time maximizes probability of detection .̂is defined as the detection probability with maximum sensing time and is determined bŷ…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known from [15] that, for a target false alarm probability , an increase in the sensing time maximizes probability of detection .̂is defined as the detection probability with maximum sensing time and is determined bŷ…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, cooperative sensing can also decrease the spectrum sensing time [42]. But the challenges of cooperative sensing mainly include: the network architecture of centralized or distributed cooperation sensing [43]; detection fusion including decision fusion or data fusion [44,45]; and cooperative node selection. Furthermore, researches in [46,47] have improved the cooperation sensing performance from the space diversity and the abnormality detection perspectives.…”
Section: Spectrum Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative detection techniques, including Likelihood ratio criterion approaches (Bayesian test [5], Neyman Pearson Test [6], etc), correspond in fact to a suitable weighting of SUs decisions. However, the proposed weights expressions supposes that the local detection and false alarm probabilities of each SU are known.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Online Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%