Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium 1991 Digest
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1991.175151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of depolarization cancellation on Ka-band satellite-to-ground path

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis shows that cross-channel interference on CP signals can be significantly reduced by this simple mitigation circuit and this approach has been reported earlier [5], [7], [8]. The analysis has revealed that the net performance of this RF mitigation technique, in general, is not equal in magnitude between an incident right CP wave and a left CP wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The analysis shows that cross-channel interference on CP signals can be significantly reduced by this simple mitigation circuit and this approach has been reported earlier [5], [7], [8]. The analysis has revealed that the net performance of this RF mitigation technique, in general, is not equal in magnitude between an incident right CP wave and a left CP wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…1(b). This technique has been reported [5], [7], [8]. The wave emerges elliptically polarized with the horizontal component that is phase delayed and attenuated more relative to those of the vertical component.…”
Section: A Ice Particlesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, according to the cross-polarization discrimination measurements of the beacon signal conducted concurrently in these observational periods, average values of the cross-polar phase vary significantly from 110° to 150° in each rainfall event even for similar rainfall rates, and this variation is shown to be primarily due to the difference of DSD which is also detected directly by observations on the ground [7]. Also, compared with Kuband (12 GHz) rain attenuation measurements using BS (Broadcasting Satellite) signal, the ratio of Ka-band (20 GHz) specific attenuation [dB/km] to that of the Ku band D Ka /D Ku shows a significant variation from 2.5 to 3.8 depending on each rainfall event, and this range of ratios is well explained by the aforementioned three kinds of DSD, being in good correlation with the distribution of cross-polar phase [16,17].…”
Section: Time Percentage Of Uplink Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 92%