1993
DOI: 10.1080/02678299308026440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation of chevron profiles in ferroelectric liquid crystal cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent models removed this constraint, allowing, instead, quantities such as the azimuthal angle, cone angle and layer dilatation to vary through the interface as well as the layer tilt [13,14]. More recently, these approaches have been used to treat the effects of shear on the structure and stability of the chevron [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent models removed this constraint, allowing, instead, quantities such as the azimuthal angle, cone angle and layer dilatation to vary through the interface as well as the layer tilt [13,14]. More recently, these approaches have been used to treat the effects of shear on the structure and stability of the chevron [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the molecule and layer tilt are allowed to vary, the defect free condition is equivalent to constraining the angles in order to maintain the horizontal spacing. de Meyere et al [30] employed an equivalent relationship in their study of smectic profiles, while other authors (e.g. Beldon et al [35]) are less strict in their geometrical approach and employ a linear relationship δ = µθ for some constant µ.…”
Section: Bookshelf and Chevron Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed Nakagawa [28] extensively studied the elastic properties of such liquid crystals and presented a general free energy very similar to that of Leslie and co-workers. A comparable approach was adopted by de Meyere et al [30] who assumed that the molecule tilt was related to the layer tilt. Limat and Prost [31] examined the transition between the Sm A bookshelf structure and the Sm C chevron, while Limat [32] extended the work of Nakagawa [28] to allow for unequal cone and layer tilt angles.…”
Section: Bookshelf and Chevron Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Another approach assumed that the molecular tilt in FLCs is related to the layer tilt. [6] In Ref. [7], Limat extended the model, [4] where unequal cone and layer tilt angles are allowed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%