2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculation latency: The μ of memory and the τ of transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In part, these format costs have been attributed to reduced use of retrieval for word problems (Campbell & Penner-Wilger, 2006) and thus the format costs are interpreted as affecting mental calculation. Our results suggest that the present format manipulation (i.e., negative signs) did not influence mental calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In part, these format costs have been attributed to reduced use of retrieval for word problems (Campbell & Penner-Wilger, 2006) and thus the format costs are interpreted as affecting mental calculation. Our results suggest that the present format manipulation (i.e., negative signs) did not influence mental calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the problem-size effect in subtraction is typically much larger than in addition, because solvers use procedural solutions more frequently (Campbell & Xue, 2001;LeFevre et al, 2006;Seyler et al, 2003). Furthermore, problem-size effects are generally larger in atypical formats than in typical or preferred formats, because atypical formats may cause participants to rely more heavily on procedural solutions (Campbell & Fugelsang, 2001;Campbell & Penner-Wilger, 2006;LeFevre, Shanahan, & DeStefano, 2004;Mauro, LeFevre, & Morris, 2003). Thus, we used the problem-size effect to evaluate whether negative numbers influence mental calculation processes in simple addition and subtraction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason for the problem size effect is that large problems tend to be solved by procedural strategies, resulting in slower and more error prone responses (Campbell and Xue, 2001). While the exact mechanism underlying the problem size effect is still up for debate, the more salient finding is that the problem size effect is larger for problems presented in word format compared to digit format (Campbell and Fugelsang, 2001; Campbell and Penner-Wilger, 2006). Campbell and colleagues have argued that this interaction between problem size and format implies that format directly impacts calculation processes, providing support for the interactive model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean of the normal component reflects a uniform time demand and for simple arithmetics tasks is mainly determined by memory retrieval time. The exponential component is found to reflect the procedural strategies t h a t have been used by test takers (Campbell & Penner-Wilger, 2006).…”
Section: Applicability Of Response Time (Rt) Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%