2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4ra15163a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating the volume of elongated bubbles and droplets in microchannels from a top view image

Abstract: We present a theoretical model to calculate the volume of bubbles and droplets in segmented microflows from given dimensions of the microchannel and measured lengths of bubbles and droplets.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From there, they can be tilted back and forth between horizontal and critical point without shape hysteresis. Although this behavior is more subtle for 3D droplets (see below), we have also observed it in experiments [15]. This absence of a hysteresis loop implies no dissipation: indeed, the quasistatic deformation of the droplet analyzed here ignores viscous dissipation and a stationary contact line does not dissipate energy [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…From there, they can be tilted back and forth between horizontal and critical point without shape hysteresis. Although this behavior is more subtle for 3D droplets (see below), we have also observed it in experiments [15]. This absence of a hysteresis loop implies no dissipation: indeed, the quasistatic deformation of the droplet analyzed here ignores viscous dissipation and a stationary contact line does not dissipate energy [16].…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…We ignore the effect of the third dimension, which plays a role in the shape of interface. As we show in the Appendix, the contact angle observed from the microscope images is dependent on the position inside the triangular pattern, probably because of the curvature effects in the third dimension [31,32]. However, such effects have been currently ignored in the model since we assume θ to be independent of the third dimension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that θ flat is relatively constant across different patterns. In contrast, the contact angle within the triangular pattern walls θ left and θ right is larger than θ flat due to the effect of third dimension [20,31,32]. Moreover, θ left and θ right are observed to be dependent on the pattern geometry, and thus we chose θ = θ flat .…”
Section: Experimental Measurement Of Contact Anglesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contact angle can be seen as counterintuitive because our glass channel has a hydrophilic wetting property. However, we believe this acute oil in water contact angle is because of (1) the presence of a thin layer of oil precoating the channel surface [41,42] and (2) a trapezoidal cross section from anisotropic etching of the glass channel [43]. We also perform the reverse-flow case, i.e., water displacement with oil for four different flow conditions, and obtain a consistent value of 95°subtended by the water with the channel sidewalls.…”
Section: Contact Angle (β) Of Oil In Water With Sidewallsmentioning
confidence: 88%