2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculating the effective delayed neutron fraction in the Molten Salt Fast Reactor: Analytical, deterministic and Monte Carlo approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the neutron flux level is normalized according to the MSFR nominal power generated and temperature distribution in the core region by matching previous work by Aufiero et al 14 To validate the adjoint sensitivity equation, the specific simple form of system response P is firstly evaluated as (30), which it does not have any direct term, ∂R/∂α with P ξ = 1. Local sensitivity of the system response can be expressed as the first derivative of P with respect to α, and it can be calculated by means of three methods: recalculation, direct method, and adjoint method as Equations (31), (32), and (33), respectively. As mentioned in the previous section, it is important to choose a proper value for Δα, which is not too large and not too small to capture the actual changes of responses.…”
Section: Validation Of the Adjoint Sensitivity Methods For Circulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the neutron flux level is normalized according to the MSFR nominal power generated and temperature distribution in the core region by matching previous work by Aufiero et al 14 To validate the adjoint sensitivity equation, the specific simple form of system response P is firstly evaluated as (30), which it does not have any direct term, ∂R/∂α with P ξ = 1. Local sensitivity of the system response can be expressed as the first derivative of P with respect to α, and it can be calculated by means of three methods: recalculation, direct method, and adjoint method as Equations (31), (32), and (33), respectively. As mentioned in the previous section, it is important to choose a proper value for Δα, which is not too large and not too small to capture the actual changes of responses.…”
Section: Validation Of the Adjoint Sensitivity Methods For Circulatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table shows the specification of the case problem as 1D steady‐state MSFR in normal operation condition. Kinetic constants of neutron precursors, fractions of precursors, β i and corresponding decay constants adopted from JEFF‐3.1 library are listed in Table . The effect of the temperature feedback on reactivity is due to the variation of the nuclear data and changes of salt thermophysical properties.…”
Section: Adjoint‐based Sensitivity Analysis For Circulating Liquid Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the unstructured mesh based multi-physics interface relies on the OpenFOAM mesh file format, which is conceptually very similar to CGNS. Some preliminary work on Serpent-OpenFOAM coupling was described by Aufiero et al (2014a) and Leppänen et al (2014). The work on the interface continues, and the current version of Serpent 2 (update 2.1.19) is capable of reading state-point information and writing power distributions in OpenFOAM format tetra-, hexa-, and polyhedral mesh files.…”
Section: Neutronics -Thermal Hydraulics Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has been performed in the frame of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) Aufiero et al, 2014;Rouch et al, 2014) neutronics and thermal-hydraulics coupling efforts. The case studied here is a one dimensional geometry reactor composed of a molten salt 7 surrounded by a reflector.…”
Section: Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%