1999
DOI: 10.1080/00268979909483103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculated nuclear shielding surfaces in the water molecule; prediction and analysis of σ(O), σ(H) and σ(D) in water isotopomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48,60-62 As expected, our zero-point vibrational corrections are in good agreement with the CASSCF results of Wigglesworth et al 57 since we use the same wave function, the differences being due mainly to the difference in force field and perturbation expansion of the vibrational wave function and to some extent also because of the different isotopic species investigated. It is also worth noticing that our CASSCF wave function is much more successful in recovering the correlation effects on the ZPVCs to the nuclear shieldings than was the case for the ZPVC to the rotational g tensor.…”
Section: Scfsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…48,60-62 As expected, our zero-point vibrational corrections are in good agreement with the CASSCF results of Wigglesworth et al 57 since we use the same wave function, the differences being due mainly to the difference in force field and perturbation expansion of the vibrational wave function and to some extent also because of the different isotopic species investigated. It is also worth noticing that our CASSCF wave function is much more successful in recovering the correlation effects on the ZPVCs to the nuclear shieldings than was the case for the ZPVC to the rotational g tensor.…”
Section: Scfsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results cannot therefore be directly compared to experiment, nor to the other theoretical studies which both studied the isotopic species H 2 17 O. 3,57 However, these differences should, considering the relatively minor difference in the total mass of the system, be rather small.…”
Section: Scfmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is now a routine procedure to include the effects of electron correlation and correlated shielding surfaces fully to second order are presently available for the nuclei in water, [5][6][7] ammonia, 5,8 phosphine, 5 and the carbon nucleus of methane. 5 Recently, noncorrelated shielding surface coefficients have been obtained for the nuclei in OCS, 9 CSe 2 , 10 and the methyl halide molecules CH 3 X͑XϭF, Cl, Br͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,5,8,21 -31] Extrapolation of NMR results obtained with systematically improved basis sets toward the basis set limit, called here the CBS limit approach, could help to discriminate between the accidentally good agreement of theoretical results obtained with Obviously, for a reliable comparison of predicted isotropic shieldings and SSCC values with those from experiment, the zero-point rovibrational corrections (ZPVCs) should be taken into account. [27,28,38,39] Among the several works on the calculations of rovibrational corrections for NMR parameters are those by Casanueva et al, [30] Vaara et al, [40] Wigglesworth et al, [41,42] Ruden et al, [43] and Ruud et al [38,44] Calculation of ZPVCs is a very demanding task computationally. [28,30,34,43,45] Thus, instead of rigorous calculations of rovibrational and thermal corrections, some authors have suggested a more approximate approach by direct transfer of ZPVCs within similar compounds and molecular fragments (see Ruud et al [45] ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%