1955
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-28-331-342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calculated Depth Dose Curves in Tissue for Broad Beams of Fast Neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference is very likely due to the secondary gamma generated by neutron interactions in the phantom. This additional dose in phantom does not exceed theoretically 10% of the neutron dose under 1 cm of tissue (27) . However, considering the uncertainties, the phantom in¯uence can be considered as negligible in this range of dose.…”
Section: Tooth Enamelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The difference is very likely due to the secondary gamma generated by neutron interactions in the phantom. This additional dose in phantom does not exceed theoretically 10% of the neutron dose under 1 cm of tissue (27) . However, considering the uncertainties, the phantom in¯uence can be considered as negligible in this range of dose.…”
Section: Tooth Enamelmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…(l3) At depths less than 24 cm, they showed that gamma dose from wide beams was considerably higher (up to 30% greater) than that calculated by SNYDER and NEUFELD. ( 3 ) The recent calculations of JONES et ul, (14) for a cylindrical phantom with collimated beams of neutrons of 2.5 and 5.0 MeV show that the recoil-ion dose component produced by scattered neutrons drops off rapidly with distance beyond the limits of the collimated beam. This feature of fast-neutron depth dose measurements with collimated beams is found also in the work of LAWSON and WATT.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This investigation employed a variety of different dose fractions and partial RBE averages simulating the effects of different incident neutron beams and depths of interest. In this calculation, in which the proton component is dominate, but the others are also important, a softer incident neutron beam or a larger depth corresponded (on the basis of pilot calculations by this investigator and information in the literature (5,6,7,8) to a somewhat larger value of Rp. The resulting overall RBE averages for all cases-considered remained nearly constant in value with a slight tendency (a few percent) of RBE to increase with increasing depth or with softer incident neutron beam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In order to test the predicted behavior, experimentation was extended to cover three oxygen gas concentrations (8,6,4%) and two radiation doses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%