1973
DOI: 10.5802/aif.491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calcul du nombre de cycles évanouissants d'une hypersurface complexe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following definitions of the relative polar varieties of f differ slightly from their more classical construction (see, for example [18,24,26]),…”
Section: Ipa-deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following definitions of the relative polar varieties of f differ slightly from their more classical construction (see, for example [18,24,26]),…”
Section: Ipa-deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let µ(f ) and µ(f | Hx 1 ) denote the Milnor number of f and that of a hyperplane section f | Hx 1 of f , where f | Hx 1 is the restriction of f to the hyperplane H x 1 = {x ∈ X | x 1 = 0}. Then, the classical Lê-Teissier formula [17,43] and the Grothendieck local duality imply the following:…”
Section: Local Cohomology and Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since σ : Z → (Z, z) is the minimal embedded resolution of {f g = 0} in Z, the map π • ϕ factorizes uniquely through σ: Recall that the Milnor number of f at z (introduced in [12]) is a topological invariant of the germ of f = 0 at z (see [6] p. 261). It is the number of vanishing cycles of f = 0 at z and equals the first Betti number of {f = t} ∩ B ε (z), where B ε (z) is a sufficiently small ball centered at z and ε |t| > 0.…”
Section: On the Other Handmentioning
confidence: 99%