Calcium Silicate–based Sealer Extrusion into the Mandibular Canal: 3 Different Recovery Outcomes—A Report of 3 Cases

Stanley, Eva; Strother, Kortnie K.; Kirkpatrick, Timothy C.; Jeong, Ji Wook

doi:10.1016/j.joen.2023.04.006

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A difference in the distance of the apices to the inferior alveolar nerve, mental foramen, and maxillary sinus exists [65][66][67][68]. The relationship between anatomic structures and teeth apices can serve as another factor that can influence the clinicians' preference for one sealer over the other, since sealer extrusions were observed in more than 47% of cases treated with a calcium silicate-based sealer [5].…”

Section: Root Canal Treatment For Teeth In Close Proximity To Anatomi...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Epoxy vs. Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers for Different Clinical Scenarios: A Narrative Review

Azizi,

Hadad,

Levy

et al. 2024

Dentistry Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to review the considerations for choosing a suitable sealer according to various endodontic scenarios. An electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science was undertaken for the keywords of ‘sealer choosing’, ‘appropriate sealer’, ‘suitable sealer’, ‘sealer for clinical scenario’, and ‘sealer for clinical situations’. However, the literature review revealed a lack of studies with practical clinical recommendations regarding the choice of appropriate endodontic root canal sealers for particular clinical situations of root canal treatment. Therefore, a narrative review was undertaken under the basis of the characteristics of an epoxy resin-based sealer (ERS) versus a calcium silicate-based sealer (CSS). Based on the evidence found through the review, the choice of an appropriate sealer in a variety of clinical scenarios was proposed. An ERS is recommended for one-visit non-vital cases, teeth with periodontal involvement, cracked teeth, and internal root resorption without root perforation. A CSS is recommended for vital or non-vital cases in multiple visits, teeth with internal root resorption with perforation or internal approach for external cervical resorption, teeth with open apices, and teeth with iatrogenic aberrations.

show abstract